Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2015 Sep 21;38(2):216–228. doi: 10.1007/s10862-015-9515-9

Table 6.

Class differences on parent management and adolescent OTP variables

Mean (SD)
Paired Comparisons
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 1 vs. 2 1 vs. 3 1 vs.4 2 vs. 3 2 vs. 4 3 vs. 4
Parent Indices
 OTP Oversight 4.29(0.57) 2.03(0.75) 2.24(0.73) 0.77(0.61) <0.001* <0.001* <0.001*   0.365 <0.001* <0.001*
 Contingency Management 2.57(1.40) 2.26(1.03) 0.69(0.54) 0.38(0.52)   0.281 <0.001* <0.001* <0.001* <0.001*   0.172
 Teacher Communication 3.01(1.53) 1.97(1.43) 1.97(1.51) 0.97(1.15)   0.001*   0.001* <0.001*   1.00 <0.001* <0.001*
 Checking Grade Portal 3.51(1.82) 2.92(1.55) 2.37(1.80) 1.22(1.54)   0.299   0.004* <0.001*   0.355 <0.001* <0.001*
 Doing Homework for Teen 0.93(1.58) 0.40(0.85) 0.96(1.34) 0.02(0.13)   0.044   0.998 <0.001*   0.021*   0.115 <0.001*
Adolescent Indices
 Teacher-Rated OTP Skills 1.88(0.75) 1.91(0.88) 1.73(0.69) 1.88(0.75)   0.998   0.778   1.00   0.657   0.996   0.694
 GPA 2.11(0.74) 2.13(0.71) 2.27(0.64) 2.05(0.78)   0.999   0.704   0.979   0.779   0.930   0.316

Means and SD represent the average number of days per week that each activity occurred.

*

Significant using Benjamini-Hochberg method with the false discovery rate restricted to 0.05. Class 1 = Parental Control, Class 2 = Collaboration, Class 3 = HWAssistance, Class 4 = Uninvolved