. 2017 Mar 10;13(5):2085–2093. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4216

Table I.

Comparison of microCT analysis of fracture calluses between PDLLA group and control group across time-points.

microCT parameters	Weeks after fixation	Con	PDLLA
BV/TV, %	2	2.469±0.14	2.435±0.11
	4	3.188±0.16	3.765±0.13^a
	6	5.132±0.18	6.123±0.13^a
BS/BV, 1/m	2	1.887±0.14	1.869±0.12
	4	2.025±0.11	2.183±0.12^a
	6	3.102±0.12	3.244±0.16^a
BV/TV, %	2	0.0740±0.0011	0.0738±0.0014
	4	0.0751±0.0013	0.0768±0.0011^a
	6	0.0831±0.0012	0.0857±0.0015^a
BS/BV, l/m	2	0.334±0.031	0.333±0.043
	4	0.491±0.034	0.522±0.062^a
	6	0.654±0.051	0.709±0.061^a
BV/TV, %	2	1.106±0.0051	1.108±0.0044
	4	1.083±0.0072	1.073±0.0035^a
	6	1.035±0.010	1.018±0.012^a

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

P<0.05. Con group, control group; PDLLA, Poly-D-L lactide treated group; BV/TV, bone volume/tissue volume; BS/BV, bone volume/bone volume.