Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 7;5:2765. Originally published 2016 Nov 25. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8937.2

Table 3. Summary data from thirteen studies using hCG detection to diagnose pregnancy and identify early pregnancy loss.

Raw FEC HCG is the ratio of hCG pregnancies detected and the number of cycles monitored in each study. Where available, mean (SD) ages of the participating women are taken directly from the published study. In some cases mean and SD (indicated by *) or SD (indicated by †) were estimated based on published demographic characteristics. §These data relate to the whole study cohort (n=124) which included known sub-fertile women, and not just to the 74 apparently fertile women. Mean value from Wilcox et al. (2001) 84. Some studies only provide data up to late pregnancy (e.g., up to 28 weeks) rather than to term. ND = no data. ¤Wilcox subsequently reported an additional hCG pregnancy which had not been detected and reported in the 1988 paper, making a total of 199 hCG pregnancies and 44 pre-clinical losses in the study group 85. #Mumford reported data from aspirin- and placebo-treated subjects who had at least one prior miscarriage. Summary data from both treatment groups are included as there was no effect of aspirin 79.

First
author
Year Number
of
women
Age mean
(SD) [range]
Number
of cycles
hCG
pregnancies
detected
Raw
FEC HCG
Clinical
pregnancies
detected
% survival
from hCG
to clinical
detection
% loss
from hCG
detection
to live
birth
Miller 1980 197 27 (4)* 623 152 24.4% 102 67.1% 42.4%
Edmonds 1982 82 27 (4)* 198 118 59.6% 51 43.2% 61.9%
Whittaker 1983 91 30 (3.7) 226 92 40.7% 85 92.4% 19.6%
Videla-
Rivero
1987 27 ND 27 12 44.4% 5 41.7% ND
Walker 1988 38 27.4 [22–38] 75 25 33.3% 25 100% 16.0%
Wilcox 1988 221 30 (4)* 707 198 ¤ 28.0% 155 78.3% 31.3%
Hakim 1995 74 31 (3)* § 305 66 21.6% 52 78.8% 37.9%
Zinaman 1996 200 30.6 (3.3) 432 116 26.9% 101 87.1% 31.3%
Wang 2003 518 24.9 (1.7) 1,561 618 39.6% 466 75.4% 35.7%
Sasaki 2008 110 [21–36] ND 62 ND 50 80.6% 32.3%
Koot 2011 46 28.7 (3.3) 103 30 29.1% 24 80.0% 26.7%
Cole 2012 168 28.8 (4.4) ND 127 ND 99 78.0% 36.2%
Mumford 2016 1088 # 28.7 (4.8) ND 785 ND 730 93.0% 23.9%