Skip to main content
. 2017 May 1;23(9-10):436–444. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0395

Table 1.

This Table Displays the Preliminary Dose–Response Comparisons of Each Dose Against Each Other

Dose Control 10 ng/mL 100 ng/mL 500 ng/mL 1 μg/mL 5 μg/mL 10 μg/mL 50 μg/mL
Control
10 ng/mL 0.33, 1.00
100 ng/mL 0.00, 1.00 0.37, 1.00
500 ng/mL 2.9, 0.26 1.4, 0.71 2.9, 0.26
1 μg/mL 4.6, 0.10 2.7, 0.31 4.6, 0.10 0.2, 1.00
5 μg/mL 28.7, <0.001 25.1, <0.001 28.7, <0.001 12.2, <0.001 13.4, <0.001
10 μg/mL 15.2, <0.001 12.3, <0.001 15.2, <0.001 6.4, 0.03 4.14, 0.126 2.8, 0.28
50 μg/mL 17.6, <0.001 14.5, <0.001 17.6, <0.001 8.24, 0.01 5.7, 0.61 1.6, 0.61 0.15, 1.00

Pearson's chi-square test for goodness of fit with Bonferroni adjustments was performed to compare a given dose with other doses given in the dose escalation preliminary study. The optimal dose was determined by 5 μg/mL as this dose showed significant perforation closure over lower doses, with higher doses not showing any significant difference. Bold highlights those comparisons showing a significant difference between doses in terms of efficacy.