Table 5.
Model1 | Mean | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amino acid | Response | L | Q | 95% Quad | LRP | LRP/Quad | QBL | ratio2 |
Phe + Tyr | Body weight gain | – | 113 | 107 | 107 | 110 | 112 | |
Breast weight | 118 | – | – | – | – | – | 112 | |
Breast fillet weight | 118 | – | – | – | – | – | ||
His | Body weight gain | 40 | – | – | – | – | – | |
Feed conversion ratio | – | 36 | 34 | 31 | 34 | 32 | ||
Breast weight | – | 39 | 37 | 36 | 38 | 40 | 38 | |
Breast fillet weight | – | 41 | 39 | 36 | 39 | 40 | ||
Breast yield | – | 41 | 39 | 37 | 39 | 41 | ||
Breast fillet yield | – | 39 | 40 | 37 | 38 | 42 | ||
Leu | Body weight gain | – | 111 | 106 | 102 | 106 | 105 | |
Breast weight | – | 110 | 105 | 99 | 104 | 101 | ||
Breast fillet weight | – | 110 | 105 | 99 | 104 | 101 | 104 | |
Breast yield | – | 110 | 105 | 99 | 105 | 100 | ||
Breast fillet yield | – | 109 | 104 | 99 | 105 | 100 |
1Optimal digestible ratio estimates shown for each response in which at least one model was significant. Abbreviations: L, linear; Q, quadratic; 95% Quad, 95% of the asymptotic parameter of the quadratic model; LRP, linear response plateau; LRP/Quad, LRP-to-quadratic regression ratio; QBL, quadratic broken line.
2Overall-mean estimated optimal digestible ratio across all significant response variables per amino acid.