TABLE 2.
First Author (Year) | Methods of Measurement | Femoral AM Bundle | Tibial AM Bundle | n | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
d/D | h/H | at/AP | mt/ML | |||
Zantop49 (2008) | Standard lateral radiographs | 18.5 | 22.3 | 36 | — | 20 |
Colombet7 (2006) | Standard lateral radiographs | 26.4 | 25.3 | 36 | — | 7 |
Lorenz24 (2009) | Standard lateral radiographs | 21 | 22 | 41 | 52 | 12 |
Iriuchishima14 (2010) | Standard lateral radiographs | 15 | 26 | 31 | 49 | 15 |
Pietrini29 (2011) | Standard lateral radiographs | 21.6 | 14.2 | 44.2 | 36.3 | 12 |
Takahashi39 (2006) | Standard lateral radiographs | 31.9 | 26.9 | — | 44.2 | 20 |
Tsukada41 (2008) | 3D CT | 21.7 | 33.2 | 37.6 | 46.5 | 36 |
Current study | 3D CT, 2-dimensional quadrant method in standard lateral position | 19.3 | 23.1 | 36.3 | 47 | 99 |
aAll values except those in the last column are percentages. Results presented for sagittal projections of the femur and tibia plus frontal projection of the tibia. at/AP, position of the tibial tunnel relative to the anteroposterior length; d/D, position of the femoral tunnel relative to the depth of the Blumensaat line; h/H, position of the femoral tunnel relative to the lateral wall height; mt/mL, position of the tibial tunnel relative to the mediolateral width of the tibial plateau. Dashes (—) indicate no data available.