Table 3.
Estimated Effect of Tailoring and eHealth Literacy on Sexual Health Decision Making
| In which of the following ways did you use the sexual health information that you received in GC? Did you use the information to… | Evaluate your personal risk for HIV/STIs? | Educate others about HIV/STIs? | Decide whether to get tested for HIV? | Decide whether to get tested for STIs? | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | ||
|
|
|||||||||
| eHealth Literacy by Condition a | |||||||||
| Tailored Intervention with Low Literacy | .09 | .28 | .18 | .26 | .21 | .26 | .28 | .27 | |
| Non-Tailored Control with Low Literacy | −.88* | .34 | −1.08*** | .31 | −.80* | .32 | −.75* | .32 | |
| Non-Tailored Control with High Literacy | .12 | .29 | −.23 | .27 | .05 | .28 | −.28 | .27 | |
| Age | −.06 | .06 | −.06 | .05 | −.11* | .06 | −.16** | .06 | |
| Race/Ethnicity b | −.37 | .23 | −.69** | .21 | −.51* | .21 | −.44* | .22 | |
| Completion of High School c | −.46 | .29 | −.18 | .27 | .11 | .28 | −.16 | .28 | |
| Internet Use | .008 | .13 | −.09 | .12 | −.07 | .13 | .13 | .13 | |
| Constant | 4.55*** | 1.27 | 4.69*** | 1.17 | 5.27*** | 1.19 | 5.86 | 1.19 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Omnibus Test | F(7,93)=2.57* | F(7,93)=4.13*** | F(7,93)=2.35*** | F(7,92)=3.25** | |||||
| R-Squared | 16.22% | 23.71% | 15.01% | 19.80% | |||||
Participants in the Tailored Intervention Condition with High eHealth Literacy served as referent group
Racial/ethnic minorities served as referent group
YMSM without a high school education served as referent group
p<.05;
p<.01;
p<.001