Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurol. 2016 Nov 25;264(7):1320–1333. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8350-6

Table 2.

Majority of studies selected for review used a variant of one of the following three scoring systems

Score Lamminen [79] Mercuri et al. [59, 78] Jungbluth et al. [62, 64]
0 Normal Normal
1 Normal muscle signal intensity Early moth-eaten appearance, with scattered small areas of increased density on T1 MRI Mild with only traces of increased signal intensity
2 Slightly hyperintense, patchy intramuscular signal changes A: Late moth-eaten appearance, with numerous discrete areas of increased density with beginning confluence, comprising less than 30% of the volume of the individual muscle
B: Late moth-eaten appearance, with numerous discrete areas of increased density with beginning confluence, comprising 30–60% of the volume of the individual muscle
Moderate with increased signal in less than 50% of affected muscle
3 Markedly hyperintense, patchy but widespread intramuscular changes Washed-out appearance, fuzzy appearance due to confluent areas of increased density with muscle still present at the periphery Severe with increased signal intensity in more than 50% of affected muscle
4 Total, homogeneous hyperintense signal change in whole muscle, equaling the signal intensity of adjacent subcutaneous or paramuscular fat End-stage appearance, muscle replaced by increased density connective tissue and fat with only rim of fascia and neurovascular structures distinguishable Entire muscle replaced by abnormal signal