Table 2.
Person fit values and their corresponding response patterns for most misfitting, well fitting, and overfitting persons.
| ID | Zh score | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Q11 | Q12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MISFITTING | |||||||||||||
| 392 | −3.92791 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| 345 | −3.79973 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| 379 | −3.52911 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| 81 | −3.47521 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 113 | −2.94507 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 391 | −2.79318 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| 1 | −2.54869 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 185 | −2.39281 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 229 | −2.24675 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 221 | −2.21036 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| WELL FITTING | |||||||||||||
| 48 | −0.03243 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| 130 | −0.02635 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 302 | −0.00813 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| 43 | −0.0019 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 256 | 0.007965 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| 136 | 0.02727 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 111 | 0.02917 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| 202 | 0.033304 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 297 | 0.036985 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 55 | 0.041895 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| OVERFITTING | |||||||||||||
| 157 | 1.944592 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 389 | 1.984945 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 67 | 1.98928 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| 128 | 1.99864 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 162 | 2.070151 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 331 | 2.098399 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| 235 | 2.155638 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 362 | 2.196376 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 380 | 2.202284 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 320 | 2.221422 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
Bold font represents items relating to the second factor. Zh-values can be interpreted using the z-scale distribution. For example, a respondent with a Zh-value of −1 shows a response pattern that deviates from the average response by one standard deviation. In addition, a respondent with −2 indicates his or her response deviates by two standard deviations from the average response pattern.