Table 6.
Participant acceptability of Foodbook24.
| Question posed to participant | Participant responses | |||
| Impact of Foodbook24 on diet | Changed a lot (%) | Changed a little (%) | Did not change at all (%) | |
| 2.5 | 34.7 | 62.7 | ||
| Completion time | Too long (%) | Okay (%) | Short (%) | Very short (%) |
| 6.8 | 63.6 | 22.9 | 6.8 | |
| User friendliness | Difficult (%) | Okay (%) | Easy (%) | Very easy (%) |
| 3.4 | 33.1 | 36.4 | 27.4 | |
| Remembering to use Foodbook24 | Difficult (%) | Okay (%) | Easy (%) | Very easy (%) |
| 6.8 | 38.1 | 40.7 | 14.4 | |
| Preferred method | Foodbook24 (%) | Reference methoda (%) | Other (%) | |
| 67.8 | 31.4 | 0.8 | ||
| Use Foodbook24 for longer | 1 week (%) | 1 month (%) | 6 months (%) | No (%) |
| 27.1 | 30.5 | 24.6 | 17.8 | |
aTwo different reference methods for comparison and validation study. This equates to 38.5% (30/78) in favor of the traditional interview-led 24HDR and 17.5% (7/40) for semi-weighed food diary.