Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 18;140(6):1729–1742. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx087

Table 4.

Functional impairments after damage to the TMS-guided SMG or pOp regions

Measure SMG pOp Control
n = 10 n = 25 n = 100
Phonological (non-word reading and digit span) Number of patients imp (not) 9 (1) 20 (5) 15 (85)
Mean score across group 46.9 47.1 57.5
SD 5.5 6.3 7.3
Writing heard words (Writ-HW) Number of patients imp (not) 7 (3) 20 (5) 34 (65)a
Mean score across group 52.8 52.1 60.1
SD 9.3 8.2 7.2
Visual word-to-picture matching (VW-P) Number of patients imp (not) 5 (5) 17 (8) 28 (72)
Mean score across group 54.9 52.4 58.1
SD 7.0 6.4 6.7
Auditory word-to-picture matching (AW-P) Number of patients imp (not) 5 (5) 10 (15) 12 (88)
Mean score across group 53.6 53.4 58.3
SD 8.1 6.4 5.8
Semantic associations (Sem-A) Number of patients imp (not) 1 (7)a 2 (22)a 7 (90)a
Mean score across group 56.4 56.3 57.0
SD 7.3 5.9 5.5

All data are from Sample 1. The table shows the numbers of patients who had impairments (or did not meet the criteria for impairments) on five different measures that differentially require phonological and semantic processing. imp = patients with impaired phonological scores; not = patients who did not meet our criteria for phonological impairments. aMissing scores: one control for Writ-HW, and two SMG, one pOp and three controls for the Sem-A task.