Skip to main content
. 2017 May 25;18:68. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0637-x

Table 2.

Description of study participants: patients (n = 145)

Urban areas Environs Rural areas
18–49 years 50 years and older 18–49 years 50 years and older 18–49 years 50 years and older
Age:
 mean (sd) 34,9 ± 10,3 60,7 ± 8,2 37,9 ± 7,6 65,5 ± 8,0 40,1 ± 8,7 64,8 ± 9,1
Gender:
 Male 7 13 10 15 7 17
 Female 16 13 10 10 15 12
Marital status:
 Married 17,4% 61,5% 45,0% 84,0% 50,0% 82,8%
 Estranged (living in separate homes) 8,7% - 5,0% - - 6,9%
 Never married 60,9% 3,8% 45,0% 4,0% 22,7% 3,4%
 Divorced 13,0% 23,1% 5,0% 4,0% 27,3% 3,4%
 Widowed - 11,5% - 8,0% - 3,4%
Education (in CASMIN grade):
 Grade 1 (low) 17,4% 42,3% 15,0% 40,0% 27,3% 34,5%
 Grade 2 (medium) 65,2% 42,3% 75,0% 32,0% 54,5% 58,6%
 Grade 3 (high) 17,4% 15,4% 10,0% 28,0% 18,2% 6,9%
Employment:
 Employed 87,0% 38,5% 95,0% 32,0% 63,6% 27,6%
 Not employed 8,7% 23,1% - 8,0% 18,2% 17,2%
 Retired 18,2% 38,5% 5,0% 56,0% 18,2% 51,7%
 Not reported - - - 4,0% - 3,4%
Chronic disease (yes): 47,8% 65,4% 50,0% 56,0% 50,0% 48,3%
Degree of disability (20–100, yes)a: 17,4% 42,3% 30,0% 24,0% 27,3% 27,6%

a‘Are you at the moment officially recognized as disabled (degree 20–100)?’: Yes/No