Skip to main content
. 2017 May 25;12:28. doi: 10.1186/s13027-017-0137-6

Table 1.

Clinic-pathological characteristics and univariate analysis of factors associated with OS and RFS

OS RFS
Variable n HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Sex (female vs male) 5 vs 34 1.179 0.345–4.031 0.792 1.016 0.229–4.509 0.984
Age years (≤52 vs >52) 21 vs 18 0.754 0.312–1.824 0.531 1.680 0.596–4.732 0.326
AFP (ng/ml; ≤20 vs >20) 13 vs 25 1.734 0.629–4.778 0.287 1.214 0.414–3.555 0.724
HBsAg (IU/mL; <1000 vs ≥1,000) 6 vs 28 5.915 0.784–44.637 0.085 1.561 0.340–7.179 0.567
HBeAg (negative vs positive) 33 vs 6 8.931 2.661–29.982 0.000 3.361 0.848–13.321 0.085
HBV-DNA (IU/mL; <1000 vs ≥1,000) 10 vs 9 7.798 1.580–38.496 0.012 2.808 0.647–12.186 0.168
HCV-Ab (S/CO; <10.9 vs ≥10.9) 8 vs 12 0.579 0.152–2.207 0.424 0.808 0.189–3.455 0.774
Liver cirrhosis (no vs yes) 13 vs 26 1.245 0.478–3.243 0.654 2.118 0.596–7.519 0.246
Tumor size (cm; ≤5 vs >5) 25 vs 14 4.336 1.753–10.722 0.001 2.302 0.793–6.686 0.125
Tumor number (single vs multiple) 31 vs 8 3.155 1.145–8.695 0.026 1.679 0.455–6.190 0.437
Vascular invasion (no vs yes) 26 vs 13 3.352 1.358–8.272 0.009 3.806 13.60–10.646 0.011
Capsule (no vs yes) 12 vs 26 1.319 0.474–3.670 0.596 0.775 0.259–2.317 0.648
Tumor differentiation (I-II vs III-IV) 21 vs 16 0.798 0.308–2.068 0.642 0.664 0.221–1.992 0.465

Note: Univariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression model

Abbreviations: HR, Hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; HCV-Ab, HCV antibody