Table 4.
Half-Cauchy | Gamma | Half-Normal | Uniform | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Half-Cauchy | − | 20.80438 | 19.44639 | 22.51744 |
15.16039 | 18.60957 | 16.4013 | ||
Gamma | −20.80438 | – | −1.357996 | 1.713055 |
15.16039 | 17.86342 | 17.0784 | ||
Half-Normal | −19.44639 | 1.357996 | – | 3.071051 |
18.60957 | 17.86342 | 15.54499 | ||
Uniform | −22.51744 | −1.713055 | −3.071051 | – |
16.4013 | 17.0784 | 15.54499 |
The differences in DIC and corresponding standard errors among BOAM applying a distinct prior. Thus, the difference between the Half-Cauchy and Gamma-distributed prior with respect to DIC is 20.80438 and the sample standard error of this difference is 15.16039. These values show that the model using a Gamma-distributed prior for the additive genetic variance fits better than does a Half-Cauchy-distributed prior, which is observed in the difference of this same comparison but in the direction Gamma vs. Half-Cauchy, in which the DIC’s difference is negative, in favor for the Gamma-distributed prior.