Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 17;67(2):140–150. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.16089

Table 1.

ANOVA of storage root yield and dry matter content of the progeny and parents of the ‘New Kawogo’ × ‘Beauregard’ mapping population

Source Yield Dry matter content


DF SS MS F Value Pr > F DF SS MS F Value Pr > F
Sitea 2 4713.4 2356.7 7.4 0.0016 2 459.6 229.8 1.04 0.3735
Gtypeb 1 100.4 100.4 0.7 0.4139 1 204.0 204.0 8.78 0.0031
Gen (Gtype)c 284 299719.0 1055.4 7.0 <.0001 284 14034.0 49.4 2.13 <.0001
Site*Gtype d 2 1254.7 627.4 4.2 0.0155 2 5.9 3.0 0.13 0.8807
Site*Gen (Gtype)e 567 180847.0 319.0 2.1 <.0001 565 21328.0 37.7 1.63 <.0001
Block (Site*Season) 15 59178.0 3945.2 26.2 <.0001 15 56347.0 3756.5 161.71 <.0001
Residual 3965 596194.0 150.4 3328 77306.0 23.2

DF = degrees of freedom, SS = sum of squares, MS = mean sum of squares (SS/DF).

a

Mean squares tests the significant effect of locations.

b

Tests the significant effect of overall least significant mean of the parents vs that of the progeny across sites and seasons.

c

Tests the significant effect of least significant means of individual genotypes (parents and progeny) across sites and seasons.

d

Tests the significant effect of site on overall parent and progeny least significant means.

e

Test the significant effect of genotype × environment interaction.