Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 30;5(4):519–526. doi: 10.1177/2050640616673517

Table 4.

Outcomes of biliary drainage at regional and tertiary center.

Regional center (N = 83) Tertiary center (N = 96)a
Patients with any complication, n (%) 38 (45.8) 39 (40.6)
 Cholangitis 15 (18.1) 18 (18.8)
 Cholecystitis 2 (2.4) 1 (1.0)
 Pancreatitis 7 (8.4) 4 (4.2)
 Bleeding 4 (4.8) 2 (2.1)
 Perforationb 3 (3.6) 1 (1.0)
 Stent dysfunction 14 (16.9) 13 (13.5)
 PTBD dislocation 0 4 (4.2)
 Other 6 (7.2) 3 (3.1)
Patients with >1 complication, n (%) 10 (12.0) 8 (8.3)
Patients with >2 complications, n (%) 1 (1.2) 6 (6.3)
Additional drainage required by tertiary center, n (%) 45 (54.2) n/a
 Inadequate FLR drainage 16 (19.3)
 Stent dysfunction 15 (18.1)
 Cholangitis 3 (3.6)
 Palliative stenting 11 (13.3)

PTBD: percutaneous transhepatic biliary drain; FLR: future liver remnant; n/a: not applicable.

a

This group also included patients who had undergone previous drainage at the regional center.

b

Perforation of duodenum (3) in regional center and perforation of bile duct (1) at tertiary center.