Skip to main content
. 2017 May 16;11(5):e0005612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005612

Table 2. Effectiveness endpoints in modified intention-to-treat population.

Figures are numbers of participants (percentage) unless stated otherwise.

Low dose High dose Risk difference [95%CI] p-value HR* [95%CI] p-value**
n = 76 n = 78
Primary composite outcome 37 (48·7%) 30 (38·5%) 10·2% [-6·7; 27·1] 0·264 0·72[0·45; 1·17] 0·199
 Worsening toxicity1 31 (43·7%) 27 (35·5%) 8·1% [-9·0; 25·3] 0·401
 Need for ventilation 15 (19·7%) 13 (16·7%) 3·1% [-10·4; 16·6] 0·776
 Death 2 (2·6%) 7 (9·0%) -6·3% [-14·9; 2·2] 0·167
Number of vials, mean ± sd 11·0 ± 7·9 12·5 ± 3·9 1·5 [-0·5; 3·5]*** 0·142
 < 10 vials 41 (53·9%) 0 (0%)
 10 to 15 vials 17 (22·4%) 70 (89·7%)
 > 15 vials 18 (23·7%) 8 (10·3%)

1Seven patients had missing data for neurotoxicity score, 5 in the low dose group and 2 in the high dose group. All of these patients required ventilation so that a positive response to the primary composite outcome could be defined. It follows that no missing data remained for the primary composite outcome.

*adjusted for center;

**log-rank test stratified for center;

***mean difference [95%CI], p value from a Welch t test