Table 3. Survey Responses of 51 WIP Presenters According to the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Hierarchy.
| All | Nonresearcher, No. (%) | Researcher, No. (%) | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trainee or junior faculty | 51 | 35 (69%) | 16 (31%) | 0.49 |
| Reaction | ||||
| Satisfied with their WIP session | 50 (98%) | 35 (100%) | 15 (94%) | 0.25 |
| Would recommend WIP to others | 51 (100%) | 35 (100%) | 16 (100%) | 1.00 |
| Any of the above | 35 (100%) | 16 (100%) | 1.00 | |
| Learning | ||||
| Advanced research methodology | 18 (35%) | 12 (34%) | 6 (38%) | 0.82 |
| Advanced knowledge in the area | 9 (18%) | 5 (14%) | 4 (25%) | 0.35 |
| Any of the above | 14 (40%) | 9 (56%) | 0.28 | |
| Behavior | ||||
| Current project | ||||
| Reframed project idea | 23 (45%) | 15 (43%) | 8 (50%) | 0.63 |
| Changed study design or methodology | 23 (45%) | 16 (46%) | 7 (44%) | 0.9 |
| Improved written or oral presentation style | 20 (39%) | 15 (43%) | 5 (31%) | 0.43 |
| Future projects | ||||
| Changed approach to future projects | 19 (37%) | 17 (49%) | 2 (13%) | 0.01 |
| Any of the above | 34 (97%) | 14 (88%) | 0.17 | |
| Results | ||||
| Valuable in advancing project to completion | 45 (88%) | 31 (89%) | 14 (88%) | 0.18 |
| Provided mentoring and peer support | 29 (57%) | 24 (69%) | 5 (31%) | 0.01 |
| Connected individuals with similar results | 13 (13%) | 9 (26%) | 4 (25%) | 0.96 |
| Any of the above | 34 (97%) | 14 (88%) | 0.17 |
NOTE: Abbreviations: WIP, works-in-progress.