Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun;183:37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.009

Table 1.

Average marginal effects (AME) of coverage and compliance for friendship degree Heckman model.

A) First stage dependent variable: coverage
B) Second stage dependent variable: compliance
Predictors AME Clustered Std. Err. p-value 95% CI AME | Coverage=1a Clustered Std. Err. p-value 95% CI
LN(Friendship degree +1), [0, 3.526] 0.067 0.016 <0.001 0.036 0.099
LN(Friendship degree +1), [>3.526] 0.303 0.232 0.193 −0.153 0.758
Friendship betweenness centralityb −1.513 1.073 0.158 −3.616 0.590
Health betweenness centrality [0, 0.268] 0.420 0.350 0.231 −0.267 1.107
Health betweenness centrality [>0.268] 0.520 0.769 0.499 −0.988 2.028
Close friends with CMD −0.004 0.020 0.846 −0.042 0.035 0.021 0.017 0.224 −0.013 0.054
Trusts CMD for health advice 0.072 0.016 <0.001 0.040 0.104 0.048 0.015 0.001 0.019 0.077
Age in years 0.001 <0.001 0.003 <0.001 0.002 <0.001 <0.001 0.546 <-0.001 0.001
Female 0.011 0.008 0.179 −0.005 0.027 0.011 0.008 0.143 −0.004 0.026
Social status: was or is a religious, tribe, or clan leader or on the local village council 0.074 0.026 0.005 0.022 0.125 0.018 0.025 0.476 −0.031 0.066
Fisherman or fishmonger −0.018 0.019 0.338 −0.055 0.019 −0.002 0.016 0.907 −0.034 0.030
Other income-earning occupation 0.019 0.013 0.159 −0.007 0.045 0.027 0.013 0.029 0.003 0.052
Highest level of education attained −0.009 0.002 <0.001 −0.012 −0.006 −0.006 0.002 <0.001 −0.009 −0.003
Muslim household head −0.049 0.017 0.005 −0.082 −0.015 −0.021 0.015 0.149 −0.050 0.008
Household head belongs to village majority tribe 0.029 0.016 0.069 −0.002 0.060 0.038 0.014 0.008 0.010 0.066
No home latrine −0.081 0.028 0.004 −0.136 −0.026 0.001 0.024 0.974 −0.047 0.049
Home owned, not rented 0.008 0.024 0.737 −0.039 0.055 0.002 0.023 0.934 −0.043 0.047
Home quality score 0.001 0.002 0.559 −0.003 0.006 −0.001 0.002 0.709 −0.005 0.004
Village centre greater than 0.50 km from Lake Victoria −0.160 0.017 <0.001 −0.193 −0.127
Total homes in village
−0.001
<0.001
<0.001
−0.001
−0.001





Obs. 14431
Households 3387
Inverse hyperbolic tangent of ρ −1.348 0.241 <0.001 −1.821 −0.875
ρ −0.874 0.057 −0.949 −0.704
Wald test of independent equations, Chi2 31.100 <0.001
a

Average marginal probability of compliance = 1 conditional on coverage (being offered treatment).

b

Entered in the Heckman selection model as grand-mean centered and a quadratic, i.e. also including the squared form.