Table 1.

Results of “Scenario A”

Scenario A	DL (n = 50)	ID (n = 50)	KV (n = 50)	AT (n = 50)	VT (n = 50)
Number of attempts (n, 1/2/3)	49/1/0	50/0/0	50/0/0	48/2/0	50/0/0
Laryngoscopy time (s)	9.46 [6.95–12.87]†¶	11.7 [9.11–15.1]†§¶	6.91 [5.59–10.1]*#	8.01 [6.21–10.2]#¶	5.87 [4.77–7.97]*#§
Tube insertion time (s)	4.98 [4.01–7.02]§	6.70 [5.49–9.47]†§¶	4.61 [2.81–6.27] #§	3.04 [2.36–4.16]*#†	3.90 [2.20–7.07]#
Intubation time (s)	15.3 [11.92–20.5]§¶	19.7 [15.2–25.8]†§¶	12.7 [9.35–17.8]#	11.2 [8.7–14.04]*#	10.5 [7.55–14.3]*#
POGO (%)	80 [60, 80]†§¶	77.5 [60–90]†§¶	90 [83.75–95]*#	90 [80–95]*#	95 [90–100]*#
Ease of technical use (1–5)	3 [2–4]†§¶	3 [2–4]†§¶	1 [1–2]*#	2 [1–3]*#†¶	1 [1–2]*#§
Ease of physical use (1–5)	4 [3–4]†§¶	3 [3–4]†§¶	1 [1–2]*#	2 [1–2]*#¶	1 [1–2]*#§
Willingness of reuse (1–5)	4 [3–5]†	3 [2–4]†¶	5 [4–5]*#§	4 [3–5]†¶	5 [3–5]#§
Use of bougie (n)	0#	4*†§¶	0#	0#	0#
Use of stylet (n)	1	3	0	0	0
Dental injury (n)	26#†§¶	16*†§¶	7*#	5*#¶	10*#§
Esophageal intubation (n)	0	0	0	0	0

Data are reported as the median [IQR] or as numbers (n)

AT Airtraq®, DL Direct laryngoscope (Macintosh), ID Custom-made, improvised laryngoscope, KV King Vision®, POGO Percent of Glottic Opening, VT VividTrac®

^*Significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to DL; ^#Significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to ID; ^†Significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to KV; ^§Significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to AT; ^¶Significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to VT