Table 3.
Comparative score for the assessment of stereochemical quality (qualitative evaluation) for the modeled WRKY proteins (SlWRKY3 and SlWRKY4) and AtWRKY4 (template1) and AtWRKY1 (template2) and complex of AtWRKY4 with W-box DNA (template3).
| S.N | Protein Name | Qmean score | Z-score | RESPROX | Most favored (%) | Additionally allowed (%) | Outlier residues (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | SlWRKY 3 Domain (predicted model 1) | 0.696 | −3.06 | 1.03 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2. | SlWRKY 4 Domain (predicted model 2) | 0.706 | −3.15 | 1.111 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 3. | C-terminal Domain of AtWRKY4 (PDB:1WJ2) (template1) | 0.557 | −3.02 | 2.274 | 89.9 | 5.8 | 4.3 |
| 4. | C-terminal Domain of AtWRKY1 (PDB: 2AYD) (template2) | 0.811 | −3.37 | 1.204 | 100 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 5. | Complex of C-terminal domain of AtWRKY4 and W- box DNA (PDB: 2LEX) (template3) | 0.470 | –2.94 | 2.793 | 77.0 | 14.8 | 8.2 |
For protein to be of good quality this values ranges between 0 and 1.5 (ReSProx). In the modeled proteins most favored region occupies 100% and number of residues lies in outlier region and disallowed region covers 0.0% (PROCHECK) compared to template where number of residues in outlier and disallowed region covered significant residues.