Skip to main content
. 2017 May 18;58(4):697–702. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.697

Table 2. Univariate and Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Analysis of Risk Factors for Overall Survival in TNBC Patients.

Parameters Univariate Cox analysis Multivariate Cox analysis
HR 95%CI p value HR 95%CI p value
Lower Higher Lower Higher
miR-34a (low) 2.062 1.164 3.654 0.013 0.875 0.371 2.061 0.759
miR-34b (low) 1.515 0.871 2.638 0.142 - - - -
miR-34c (low) 2.474 1.373 4.460 0.003 3.075 1.293 7.311 0.011
Age (>50) 1.153 0.883 2.659 0.129 - - - -
Menstrual status (postmenopause) 1.194 0.690 2.064 0.527 - - - -
Tumor grade (III) 1.790 1.031 3.108 0.039 2.071 1.168 3.671 0.013
Tumor size (>2 cm) 1.450 0.827 2.542 0.195 - - - -
Lymph node status (positive) 2.107 1.188 3.734 0.011 1.881 0.979 3.612 0.050
Metastasis (positive) 2.871 1.624 5.078 <0.001 2.249 1.129 4.480 0.021
Surgery 0.317 0.181 0.554 <0.001 0.684 0.319 1.468 0.330
Chemotherapy 0.653 0.090 4.740 0.674 - - - -
Radiotherapy 2.514 1.248 5.064 0.010 1.403 0.605 3.256 0.431

TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; miR-34, microRNA-34.

Data are presented as HR, 95% CI and p value. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Significance was determined by univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and all factors with a p value <0.1 were further analyzed by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression.