Skip to main content
. 2017 May 18;58(4):829–836. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.829

Table 1. Clinical Details of the Patients and the Results.

Case Sex Side Age (yr) Ulnar injury Interval between injury and operation (month) MUB (mm) Location of MUB (%) Follow-up (month) Final Result* Complications
Open reduction alone (Group 1)
 1 M R 4 Plastic 1 3.3 40 60 Good
 2 F L 6.3 Plastic 3 2.2 27 13 Good
 3 F L 6 Plastic 2 2.6 36 12 Good
 4 M L 8.2 No 1 0 NA 120 Good
 5 F L 5 Plastic 1 3.7 35 18 Good
 Median 6 1 3 35.5 18
Open reduction and ulnar osteotomy (Group 2)
 6 F L 4 Plastic 2 7 37 28 Good
 7 M R 6.3 Fracture 2 3.6 53 69 Good
 8 F R 6 Fracture 84 4.8 53 60 Good Cheilectomy
 9 F R 8.2 Fracture 39 4.3 54 89 Good
 10 M R 5 Fracture 79 11 62 78 Good
 11 M R 4 Fracture 3 5 34 168 Poor Cubitus valgus
 12 M R 6.3 Plastic 2 3.3 73 62 Good
 13 M R 6 Plastic 12 4 38 20 Good
 14 M L 8.2 Plastic 4 4.3 35 27 Good
 15 F L 5 Fracture 36 2.5 72 24 Good
 16 M L 4 Fracture 7 5 60 24 Good
 17 F R 6.3 Fracture 26 6 46 14 Good
 18 F L 6 Fracture 7 4.5 43 37 Good Delayed union
 19 M R 13.4 Fracture 6 4 67 12 Good
 20 F R 5.8 Plastic 2 4.5 46 36 Good
 21 F R 9.3 Fracture 30 7 68 12 Good
 22 M R 3.5 Fracture 6 5.6 42 14 Good Delayed union
 Median 6 7.0 4.5 53 28

MUB, maximum ulnar bow; Plastic, plastic deformation.

*‘Good’ means complete reduction without osteolytic change and ‘Poor’ means radial head dislocation.