Skip to main content
. 2017 May 29;21:123. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1710-5

Table 1.

Main characteristics of the randomized controlled trials included in the meta-analysis (HME vs HH with heated and non-heated wire)

First Author/year Study design Population Age Exclusion criteria Number of patients (HME/HH) Severity of illness Characteristic of passive humidifier/frequency of change Active humidifier (HH) TV/MV Frequency of change of ventilator circuit Diagnosis of VAP
Oğuz 2013 [83] SC/RCT General ICU with intubation <24 hours 47.9 vs 44.5 Patients with intubation >24 hours, pneumonia 18 vs 17 n.a. HME replaced daily HH n.a. n.a. CXR infiltration
Boots 2006 [82] SC/RCT General ICU with MV >48 hours 59 vs 60 Patients presenting history (airway hemorrhage, asthma, or airway burns) suggested a need for HH 190 vs 191 APACHE II 20 vs 20 Hygroscopic HME with a bacterial viral filter/24 hours Hot-water humidification with a heated wire in both inspiratory and expiratory circuit limbs (DHW) or the inspiratory limb only (SHW) n.a. Every new patients CPIS ≥6 Tracheal suction
Lorente 2006 [81] SC/RCT ICU with patients expected to require mechanical ventilation for >5 days 56 vs 55 Age <18 years, HIV, WBC <1000 cells/mm3 solid or hematological tumor and immunosuppressive therapy 53 vs 51 APACHE II 18.11/18.72 HME: Edith Flex (Datex-Ohmeda) changed at 48-hour interval MR 850 ® (Fisher & Paykel Health Care Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand) and the Aerodyne 2000®servo-controlled humidifiers with wire-heated circuits without water traps and with an autofeed chamber to refill the chamber with water n.a. No routine change of ventilator circuit Tracheal aspirate
Lacherade 2005 [80] MC/RCT 5 ICUs located in two French university-affiliated teaching hospitals Medical, Surgical, Neurosurgical requiring MV >48 hours 55.2 vs 54.7 Contraindications to the use of an HMEF or of an HH, patients admitted after cardiac arrest, patients already enrolled in a clinical trial, and patients with early decision of treatment withdrawal were not included 185 vs 184 SAPS II 45.4 vs 49.3 DAR Hygrobac filter device (Tyco Healthcare/Nellcor, Pleasanton, CA, USA (changed at 48 hours interval) The MR730 device (Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand). Heated wire n.a. Changed for every new patient Invasive respiratory secretion samplings cultured quantitatively, using a protected telescoping catheter or BAL
Diaz 2002 [79] SC/RCT Intubated patients 61 vs 66 Previous pulmonary disease, hypothermia, pulmonary secretion or low expiratory volume 23 vs 20 n.a. HME HH n.a. n.a n.a.
Memish 2001 [78] SC/RCT MV for 48 hours in adult ICUs, Medical surgical unit 47.7 vs 46 Ventilated <48 hours 123 vs120 APACHE II 20.8 vs 20.6 HME Hudson RCI, Temecula, CA, USA)/n.a. HH n.a. n.a. Tracheal aspirate
Kollef 1998 [76] SC/RCT 17 years and required mechanical ventilation while in the ICU setting. 57.8 vs 59 Transferred from other hospitals and had already received mechanical ventilation, if they had heart or lung transplantation, or if they had massive hemoptysis 163 vs 147 APACHE II 17 vs 18.2 Nellcor Puritan-Bennett; Eden Prairie, Minn)/every week HH with heated wire circuit The number of patients requiring a minute ventilation >10 L/min (38% vs 34%) Changed for every new patient Tracheal aspirate
Lucchetti 1998 [77] SC/RCT Critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation 57 vs 56.3 n.a. 15 vs 30 n.a. Hygrobac DAR Bennett Cascade II, MR600 Fysher and Paykel set at 37 °C TV 563 vs 594.2 n.a. Airway secretion score
Boots 1997 [73] SC/RCT General/patients requiring MV > 48 hours 51 Patients with asthma, airway burns, or pulmonary hemorrhage 42 (2 days), 33 (4 days) vs HH 41 (2 days) APACHE II 19 vs18 Bacterial-viral filter (Humid-Vent Filter Light, Gibeck Respiration, Vasby, Sweden)/2 days or 4 days circuit change (2 groups) MR730, Fisher and Paykel Health Care Pty Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand/HH circuit with 2 days circuit change n.a. Every 48 hours Tracheal aspirate
Hurni 1997 [74] SC/RCT Medical ICU/patients who required >48 hours of MV 52.6 vs 59.5 Hypothermic (central or rectal temperature <36 °C), or who had been intubated for 12 hours before ICU admission were excluded 59 vs 56 SAPS II 12.9 vs 12.8 Hygroster; DAR; Mirandola, Italy/every 24 hours Fisher Paykel; Auckland, New Zealand, or Puritan-Bennett set at 37 °C n.a. 48 Hours in HH group and weekly in HME Tracheal aspirate
Kirton 1997 [75] SC/RCT 20-Bed trauma ICU >15 years who required MV 47/46 vs 48 Yes: requirement for high minute volume 280 Injury severity score (ISS) 22 vs 20 Pall BB-100; Pall Corporation; East Hills, NY, USA (hydrophobic) 24 hours Heated wire humidifier (H-wH) (Marquest Medical Products Inc., Englewood, CO, USA) n.a. Every 7 days Tracheal aspirate
Branson 1996 [71] SC/RCT Surgical-medical ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation deemed suitable for HME 44 vs 41 Patients deemed unsuitable for HME such as presence of thick or bloody secretions 49 vs 54 SAPS II 9 vs 8 HME hygroscopic Baxter/24 hours Heated wire humidifier MR730 (Fisher & Paykel) set at 36 °C n.a. Every 7 days Tracheal aspirate
Villafane 1996 [72] SC/RCT Intubated and mechanically ventilated patients 67 vs 59 Patients with hemorrhagic disorder, intubated >24 hours, expected for intubation for short time, drugs overdose 16 vs. 7 SAPS 17 vs 17 HME hygroscopic BB-2215, Pall. HME Hygroscopic 352/5411 DAR MR310 Fysher and Paykel set at 32 °C MV 11.3 vs 10.2 L/min n.a. n.a.
Dreyfuss 1995 [70] SC/RCT Medical patients who required >48 hours of MV 58 vs 62 No 61 vs 70 SAPS II 16.0 vs 16.4 HME hygroscopic DAR-Hygrobac II (DAR SpA, Mirandola, Italy) device three-layer water-repellent membranes with electrostatic and mechanical filtering power and of one hygroscopic membrane/change on daily basis Puritan-Bennett Respiratory Products, Santa Monica, CA) or Fischer-Paykel MR 450 or MR 460 devices n.a. Every new patient Quantitative cultures of protected specimen brush
Roustan 1992 [69] SC/RCT General/patients requiring MV (France) 52.7 (18.5) vs 49.3 (18.7) Weight less than 35 kg and patients requiring high-frequency jet ventilation 55 vs 61 SAPS II 11.5 vs 11.5 Pall Filter BB 2215 HME (hygrophobic)/every 24 hrs Draegger Aquaport, temperature was set 31 and 32 at the Y piece. TV 665 vs 460 ml n.a. None
Misset 1991 [68] SC/RCT Medical-surgical/patients requiring MV >5 days (France) 53(14) vs 49 (13) No 30 vs 26 SAPS II 14 vs 13 HME hydrophobic (every 24 hours) Bennett cascade II or Fisher Paykel MR 450 set at 32 °C or 34 °C No difference in tracheal thickness and characteristic between MV >10 L and <10 L 11.9 (2.5) vs 11.2 (2.9) Every 48 hours Tracheal aspirate
Martin 1990 [67] SC/RCT All patients to receive mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours 61 vs 54 No 31 vs 42 n.a. Pall Ultipor (hydrophobic) breathing circuit filter (PUBCF) replaced at least daily HH: set at 31 °C 11 (2.5) vs 10.11 (3) 3 Times weekly Tracheal aspirates
Kirkegaard 1987 [66] SC/RCT Neurosurgical patients 15 vs 15 No 52 vs 36 n.a. HME hygroscopic Engstrom Edith, Gambro HH Hygrotherm n.a 24 Hours None

HME heat and moisture exchanger, HH heated humidifier, MV mechanical ventilation, VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia, RCT randomized controlled trial, WBC white blood cells, APACHE acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, SAPS simplified acute physiology score