Abstract
In this paper, readings of solar radiation received at three meteorological sites in Nigeria were analysed. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical test was carried out on the data set to observe the significant differences on radiations for each quarter of the specified years. The data were obtained in raw form from Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NIMET), Oshodi, Lagos. In order to get a clear description and visualization of the fluctuations of the radiation data, each year were considered independently, where it was discovered that for the 3rd quarter of each year, there is a great fall in the intensity of the solar radiation to as low as 73.27 (W/m2), 101.66 (W/m2), 158.51 (W/m2) for Ibadan, Port-Harcourt and Sokoto respectively. A detailed data description is available for the averages across months for each quarter. The data can provide insights on the health implications of exposure to solar radiation and the effect of solar radiation on climate change, food production, rainfall and flood patterns.
Keywords: ANOVA, Solar radiation, Tukey׳s Post Hoc, Port Harcourt, Sokoto, Ibadan
Specification Table
Subject area | Environmental Science |
More specific subject area | Solar Radiation |
Type of data | Table and figure |
How data was acquired | Unprocessed secondary data |
Data format | Processed as Monthly Averages Across Quarters from 2011 to 2015 for Three Meteorological Sites |
Experimental factors | Data obtained from Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NIMET) |
Experimental features | Computational Analysis: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Post Hoc Test and Correlation Analysis. |
Data source location | Ibadan, Port-Harcourt and Sokoto Meteorological Stations. |
Data accessibility | All the data are in this data article. |
Software | Microsoft Excel and Minitab 17 Statistical Software |
Value of the data
-
●
The energy sector of the economy can incorporate the data set and findings for the utilization of solar radiation received from the sites.
-
●
The vitality of these data set is widely recognised in the energy research community for forecasting minutely, hourly, daily and monthly solar radiations using time series tools which could also cater for volatility that exist in the data.
-
●
For educational purposes and environmental studies. See similar works [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33].
-
●
Findings from the data bring the awareness of the Nigerian government to the most suitable location for the establishment of both solar plants and research institutes to generate electricity.
-
●
The data can provide insights on the health implications of exposure to solar radiation.
1. Data
The raw data for this work were obtained from Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NIMET) Oshodi Lagos, as daily averages on solar radiation for three weather stations namely; Ibadan, Sokoto and Port-Harcourt. The readings were taken using the Gunn-Bellani Radiation Integrator measuring the radiations in millilitres (ml). However, for the sake of this research, the readings were converted to Watts per Sq. meters (1 ml to 13.153 W/m2) covering from 1st of January, 2011 to 31st of December, 2015 and further transformed into monthly-quarterly averages (Table 7) for the specified years using Microsoft Excel software.
Table 7.
Year | Month | Quarter | Ibadan | Sokoto | Port Harcourt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | Jan | Q1 | 152.9544 | 216.6395 | 195.3404 |
2011 | Feb | Q1 | 167.1816 | 221.9066 | 173.1943 |
2011 | Mar | Q1 | 179.9389 | 244.9392 | 180.448 |
2011 | Apr | Q2 | 162.218 | 242.0993 | 182.9117 |
2011 | May | Q2 | 154.397 | 232.1683 | 160.7612 |
2011 | Jun | Q2 | 126.53 | 189.8827 | 131.3527 |
2011 | Jul | Q3 | 90.88166 | 168.1862 | 121.4725 |
2011 | Aug | Q3 | 91.89994 | 163.3494 | 114.3021 |
2011 | Sep | Q3 | 112.588 | 218.2928 | 134.7724 |
2011 | Oct | Q4 | 141.0745 | 231.2348 | 141.5836 |
2011 | Nov | Q4 | 166.8653 | 259.2857 | 155.8608 |
2011 | Dec | Q4 | 186.7699 | 220.9247 | 188.9337 |
2012 | Jan | Q1 | 153.8454 | 233.9503 | 169.7561 |
2012 | Feb | Q1 | 149.9874 | 236.8866 | 148.0371 |
2012 | Mar | Q1 | 171.4956 | 255.0796 | 157.5473 |
2012 | Apr | Q2 | 168.6628 | 254.1561 | 155.8032 |
2012 | May | Q2 | 140.2683 | 228.6467 | 175.9798 |
2012 | Jun | Q2 | 106.2308 | 198.5635 | 155.5539 |
2012 | Jul | Q3 | 98.30663 | 170.3925 | 123.297 |
2012 | Aug | Q3 | 84.72954 | 163.9434 | 132.4191 |
2012 | Sep | Q3 | 102.2412 | 237.7151 | 139.4198 |
2012 | Oct | Q4 | 148.6692 | 225.507 | 169.9258 |
2012 | Nov | Q4 | 149.4159 | 235.8298 | 164.1032 |
2012 | Dec | Q4 | 156.1366 | 252.3218 | 183.3756 |
2013 | Jan | Q1 | 143.9172 | 241.5025 | 190.2066 |
2013 | Feb | Q1 | 152.4786 | 263.7138 | 182.1664 |
2013 | Mar | Q1 | 170.1379 | 274.2572 | 190.2914 |
2013 | Apr | Q2 | 153.0987 | 246.2206 | 190.1896 |
2013 | May | Q2 | 152.318 | 266.2807 | 155.0758 |
2013 | Jun | Q2 | 122.4965 | 238.1973 | 118.5945 |
2013 | Jul | Q3 | 90.37251 | 204.8868 | 104.1193 |
2013 | Aug | Q3 | 91.51808 | 158.5125 | 104.4163 |
2013 | Sep | Q3 | 123.5487 | 220.8356 | 103.7318 |
2013 | Oct | Q4 | 147.5236 | 196.0405 | 160.1248 |
2013 | Nov | Q4 | 159.2367 | 215.5635 | 140.6912 |
2013 | Dec | Q4 | 161.1007 | 241.7571 | 180.2359 |
2014 | Jan | Q1 | 151.5119 | 260.3407 | 187.0669 |
2014 | Feb | Q1 | 165.4435 | 265.0291 | 185.4546 |
2014 | Mar | Q1 | 161.6947 | 283.3369 | 149.3904 |
2014 | Apr | Q2 | 177.256 | 273.8853 | 173.354 |
2014 | May | Q2 | 166.4042 | 245.7454 | 155.1183 |
2014 | Jun | Q2 | 135.6931 | 251.1309 | 121.3127 |
2014 | Jul | Q3 | 99.66434 | 213.1179 | 105.4346 |
2014 | Aug | Q3 | 73.27386 | 168.3135 | 109.7623 |
2014 | Sep | Q3 | 109.8259 | 233.287 | 103.2934 |
2014 | Oct | Q4 | 136.8316 | 265.9048 | 159.7854 |
2014 | Nov | Q4 | 153.5371 | 289.4494 | 132.2734 |
2014 | Dec | Q4 | 170.6895 | 273.8075 | 168.4408 |
2015 | Jan | Q1 | 179.5146 | 253.1279 | 188.5943 |
2015 | Feb | Q1 | 179.7237 | 308.7152 | 166.6179 |
2015 | Mar | Q1 | 175.399 | 269.7174 | 169.0348 |
2015 | Apr | Q2 | 177.2122 | 293.1761 | 157.4829 |
2015 | May | Q2 | 178.2418 | 274.8512 | 145.487 |
2015 | Jun | Q2 | 131.3527 | 256.4359 | 124.2063 |
2015 | Jul | Q3 | 106.962 | 227.5436 | 101.6585 |
2015 | Aug | Q3 | 105.1376 | 201.4077 | 112.5626 |
2015 | Sep | Q3 | 110.3959 | 218.6873 | 128.3276 |
2015 | Oct | Q4 | 132.8434 | 244.4301 | 156.8578 |
2015 | Nov | Q4 | 152.7041 | 250.2541 | 187.9975 |
2015 | Dec | Q4 | 172.3018 | 209.2145 | 231.9561 |
Table 1a is the statistical summary of the quarterly averages for solar radiation from the 1st of January 2011 to 31st of December 2015. Meanwhile, it was observed that on an average, Sokoto receives the highest intensity of solar radiation followed by Port Harcourt and Ibadan.
Table 1a.
Variable | N | Mean | S.E Mean | Std. Dev. | Minimum | Q1 | Median | Q3 | Maximum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ibadan | 60 | 142.24 | 3.84 | 29.76 | 73.27 | 115.07 | 151.91 | 166.75 | 186.77 |
Sokoto | 60 | 235.01 | 4.40 | 34.08 | 158.51 | 217.05 | 237.96 | 258.57 | 308.72 |
Port H | 60 | 153.29 | 3.85 | 29.85 | 101.66 | 129.08 | 156.36 | 179.17 | 231.96 |
Furthermore, Table 1b shows that the data set from all sites exhibit negative kurtosis and skew, implying that the distributions are light-tailed and skewed to the left respectively.
Table 1b.
Variable | Kurtosis | Skewness |
---|---|---|
Ibadan | −0.77 | −0.60 |
Sokoto | −0.02 | −0.45 |
Port H | −0.57 | −0.05 |
From the graphs (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5), it was observed that Sokoto was top on the presented charts with an exception on December 2015. This validates that the closer the earth׳s surface is to the sun, the greater the radiations it receives, which is well applicable to the case of Sokoto ranking top among the other stations with a height of 309 m above sea level. Furthermore, the solar radiation received at Sokoto increases yearly within the 1st quarter. It has to be noted that the y-axis of the figures is the solar radiation reading for the zones measured in Watt per square meter.
2. Methods and materials
The summary of the location sites of the raw data are displayed in Table 2.
Table 2.
Sites | Latitude | Longitude | Height (m) |
---|---|---|---|
Ibadan | 07.22′ | 03.59′ | 224.01 |
Sokoto | 12.55′ | 05.12′ | 309.0 |
Port Harcourt | 05.01′ | 06.57′ | 247.0 |
Linear correlation is traditionally used to roughly determine the relationship between two variables. Table 3 shows the correlation matrix between the three meteorological stations. Though independent, the correlations among each station are positive and that of Sokoto–Ibadan and Ibadan–Port Harcourt are highly positively correlated. It is either the solar radiation levels are increasing or decreasing at the three sites simultaneously.
Table 3.
Sites | Ibadan | Sokoto | Port Harcourt |
---|---|---|---|
Ibadan | 1 | ||
Sokoto | 0.741099 | 1 | |
Port H | 0.755118 | 0.426821562 | 1 |
The ANOVA test carried out on the data set for all sites and the result was displayed in Table 4, Table 5, Table 6. The results showed significant differences in the means for solar radiation received quarterly at the stations independently.
Table 4.
Source of variation | D.F | S.S | M.S | F-value | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quarters | 3 | 31672 | 10557.3 | 28.29 | 0.000 |
Error | 56 | 20898 | 373.2 | ||
Total | 59 | 52570 |
Table 5.
Source of variation | D.F | S.S | M.S | F-value | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quarters | 3 | 29161 | 9720.4 | 13.83 | 0.000 |
Error | 56 | 39364 | 702.9 | ||
Total | 59 | 68526 |
Table 6.
Source of variation | D.F | S.S | M.S | F-value | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quarters | 3 | 38059 | 12686.3 | 50.04 | 0.000 |
Error | 56 | 14197 | 253.5 | ||
Total | 59 | 52256 |
The significant differences in the means as revealed from the ANOVA results led to further analysis using the Tukey׳s Simultaneous 95% Confidence Interval Post Hoc test. The aim is to detect the specific quarters where differences lie across the specified years.
The results revealed that for Port Harcourt, significant differences lie within all other quarters except for the 1st and 4th quarters and for the 2nd and 4th quarters yearly as seen in Fig. 6. Similarly, Fig. 7 shows that for Sokoto, the 1st and 3rd quarters, 3rd and 4th quarters and the 2nd and 3rd quarters as having significant differences. Lastly, Fig. 8 shows that for Ibadan, significance differences exists between the 1st and 3rd Quarters, 2nd and 3rd Quarters and the 3rd and 4th Quarters for these years. Minitab17 software was implemented for analysis on the solar radiation data, which produced the ANOVA results and the Post Hoc test for the stations (Table 7).
Acknowledgement
This work is sponsored by Centre for Research, Innovation and Discovery, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria.
Footnotes
Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.017.
Transparency document. Supplementary material
.
References
- 1.Muluget M., Tolossa D., Abebe G. Description of long-term climate data in Eastern and Southeastern Ethiopia. Data Brief. 2017;12:26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.03.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mwalusepo S., Muli E., Faki A., Raina S. Land use and land cover data changes in Indian Ocean Islands: case study of Unguja in Zanzibar Island. Data Brief. 2017;11:117–121. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pantavou K.G., Jacovides C.P., Nikolopoulos G.K. Data on solar sunburning ultraviolet (UVB) radiation at an urban Mediterranean climate. Data Brief. 2017;11:597–600. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.02.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mohammadi M.J., Takdastan A., Jorfi S., Neisi A., Farhadi M., Yari M. Electrocoagulation process to chemical and biological oxygen demand treatment from carwash grey water in Ahvaz megacity, Iran. Data Brief. 2017;11:634–639. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Babaahmadi F., Dobaradaran S., Pazira A., Eghbali S.S., Khorsand M., Keshtkar M. Data on metal levels in the inlet and outlet wastewater treatment plant of hospitals in Bushehr province, Iran. Data Brief. 2017;10:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Estrada-Contreras I., Sandoval-Ruiz C.A., Mendoza-Palmero F.S., Ibáñez-Bernal S., Equihua M., Benítez G. Data documenting the potential distribution of Aedes aegypti in the center of Veracruz, Mexico. Data Brief. 2017;10:432–437. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rekadwad B.N., Khobragade C.N. Is the increase in oil pollution a possibility of the presence of diverse microorganisms? An experimental dataset on oil prevalent areas of Goa, India. Data Brief. 2016;9:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.07.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Okoye C.O., Taylan O. Performance analysis of a solar chimney power plant for rural areas in Nigeria. Renew. Energy. 2017;104:96–108. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ogunjo S.T., Adediji A.T., Dada J.B. Investigating chaotic features in solar radiation over a tropical station using recurrence quantification analysis. Theor. Appl. Clim. 2017;127(1–2):421–427. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ayodele T.R., Ogunjuyigbe A.S.O. Performance assessment of empirical models for prediction of daily and monthly average global solar radiation: the case study of Ibadan, Nigeria. Int. J. Ambient Energy. 2017 in press. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ohijeagbon O.D., Ajayi O.O. Solar regime and LVOE of PV embedded generation systems in Nigeria. Renew. Energy. 2015;78:226–235. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ohunakin O.S., Adaramola M.S., Oyewola O.M., Matthew O.J., Fagbenle R.O. The effect of climate change on solar radiation in Nigeria. Sol. Energy. 2015;116:272–286. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ayodele T.R., Ogunjuyigbe A.S.O. Prediction of monthly average global solar radiation based on statistical distribution of clearness index. Energy. 2015;90:1733–1742. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Njoku H.O. Solar photovoltaic potential in Nigeria. J. Energy Engine. 2014;140(2) (Article number 04013020) [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ajayi O.O., Ohijeagbon O.D., Nwadialo C.E., Olasope O. New model to estimate daily global solar radiation over Nigeria. Sust. Energy Technol. Assess. 2014;5:28–36. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ogolo E.O. Estimation of global solar radiation in Nigeria using a modified Angstrom model and the trend analysis of the allied meteorological components. Indian J. Radio Sp. Phys. 2014;43(3):213–224. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Giwa A., Alabi A., Yusuf A., Olukan T. A comprehensive review on biomass and solar energy for sustainable energy generation in Nigeria. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017;69:620–641. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Okonkwo G.N., Nwokoye A.O.C. Solar radiation analysis and temperature profiles of thermosyphon solar water heater at Awka, Nigeria. Adv. Nat. Appl. Sci. 2012;6(2):189–194. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Taura L.S., Musa A.O., Saleh S. Estimation of the global solar radiation and its derivatives over the two (2) vegetation zones of Jigawa state. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 2012;79(1):99–109. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Boyo A.O., Adeyemi K.A. Analysis of solar radiation data from satellite and Nigeria meteorological station. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 2011;1(4):314–322. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Olayinka S. Estimation of global and diffuse solar radiations for selected cities in Nigeria. Int. J. Energy Environ. Engine. 2011;2(3):13–33. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alonge A.F., Iroemeha O.D. Estimation of solar radiation for crop drying in Uyo, Nigeria using a mathematical model. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013;824:420–428. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ohunakin O.S., Adaramola M.S., Oyewola O.M., Fagbenle R.O. Correlations for estimating solar radiation using sunshine hours and temperature measurement in Osogbo, Osun State, Nigeria. Front. Energy. 2013;7(2):214–222. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Adaramola M.S. Estimating global solar radiation using common meteorological data in Akure, Nigeria. Renew. Energy. 2012;47:38–44. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oladosu O.R., Sunmonu L.A. Investigation of surface energy budget over a humid tropical site at Ile-ife, Nigeria: a comparison of eddy covariance and bowen ratio methods. Indian J. Radio Sp. Phys. 2011;40(1):37–44. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Okundamiya M.S., Nzeako A.N. Empirical model for estimating global solar radiation on horizontal surfaces for selected cities in the six geopolitical zones in Nigeria. J. Control Sci. Engine. 2011;(2011) (Article number 356405) [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chineke T.C., Okoro U.K. Application of Sayigh "Universal Formula" for global solar radiation estimation in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Renew. Energy. 2010;35(3):734–739. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fadare D.A. Modelling of solar energy potential in Nigeria using an artificial neural network model. Appl. Energy. 2009;86(9):1410–1422. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Augustine C., Nnabuchi M.N. Relationship between global solar radiation and sunshine hours for Calabar, Port Harcourt and Enugu, Nigeria. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2009;4(4):182–188. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chiemeka I.U. Estimation of solar radiation at Uturu, Nigeria. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2008;3(5):126–130. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chineke T.C. Equations for estimating global solar radiation in data sparse regions. Renew. Energy. 2008;33(4):827–831. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jegede O.O., Ogolo E.O., Aregbesola T.O. Estimating net radiation using routine meteorological data at a tropical location in Nigeria. Int. J. Sustain. Energy. 2006;25(2):107–115. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jegede O.O. A note on net radiation at Osu, Nigeria. Meteorol. Z. 2003;12(5):269–271. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.