Skip to main content
. 2017 May 30;8:885. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00885

Table 3.

Agronomic performances of the selected transgenic lines under different glyphosate treatments.

Homozygous lines Glyphosate dosage (ppm) Shoot height (cm) Plant weight (g plant-1)
G2-6 0 16.45 ± 0.22a 0.79 ± 0.01a
5 16.4 ± 0.68a 0.78 ± 0.05a
10 14.47 ± 0.05b 0.71 ± 0.01b
25 13.77 ± 0.14b 0.68 ± 0.04b
50 10.48 ± 0.71c 0.46 ± 0.02c
100 8.96 ± 0.55d 0.38 ± 0.02c
200 4.48 ± 0.4e 0.12 ± 0.05d
800 1.65 ± 0.24f 0.05 ± 0.03d
G2-7 0 16.8 ± 0.83a 0.84 ± 0.01a
5 16.4 ± 1.83a 0.89 ± 0.03a
10 16.44 ± 1.01a 0.85 ± 0.01a
25 16.28 ± 1.44a 0.82 ± 0.03a
50 11.16 ± 0.56b 0.52 ± 0.06b
100 10.26 ± 0.53b 0.46 ± 0.13b
200 4.86 ± 0.8c 0.1 ± 0.02c
800 1.09 ± 0.1d 0.03 ± 0.01c
Source of variation
Homozygous lines (HL) ∗∗ ∗∗
Glyphosate dosage (GD) ∗∗ ∗∗
HLGD ns ns

The parameters are shown as average values ( ± standard deviation) that were collected from 40 plants in three replicates for each treatment. Numbers followed by different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). ns, not significant (P > 0.05). ∗∗ Significant at P < 0.01.