Skip to main content
. 2017 May 30;8:795. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00795

Table 3.

Correlations among the RED-9 and other scales in Study 2.

Scale RED-9 PFS FCQ-T-R PEMS TFEQ-R TFEQ-D TFEQ-H DEBQ-R DEBQ-E DEBQ-X
Mean (SD) 0.0 (0.77) 42.80 (14.22) 42.65 (19.38) 41.87 (15.93) 9.59 (5.10) 7.43 (4.08) 6.99 (4.22) 26.78 (8.82) 33.42 (14.88) 31.30 (7.60)
PFS 0.76
FCQ-T-R 0.81 0.81
PEMS 0.57 0.67 0.68
TFEQ-R -0.03 -0.09 0.01 -0.02
TFEQ-D 0.73 0.68 0.83 0.61 0.02
TFEQ-H 0.72 0.70 0.74 0.58 -0.15 0.72
DEBQ-R 0.21 0.15 0.27 0.21 0.79 0.29 0.09
DEBQ-E 0.65 0.68 0.82 0.69 -0.03 0.80 0.62 0.23
DEBQ-X 0.66 0.77 0.77 0.66 -0.14 0.72 0.71 0.12 0.72
BMI-RES 0.40 0.31 0.43 0.26 0.02 0.50 0.33 0.19 0.38 0.31

DEBQ = Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire: -R = Restraint; -E = Emotional Eating; -X = Externalized Eating; PFS = Power of Food Scale; FCQ-T-R = Food Craving Questionnaire, Trait, Reduced; PEMS = Palatable Eating Motives Scale. See Table 2 note for other abbreviations. Correlations of r = 0.12 or greater are statistically significant at p < 0.05. BMI was log transformed and residualized in an identical fashion to Study 1.