Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 13;5(3):739–749. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.454

Table 4.

Panelists Preference for specific quality characteristics of milk‐barberry samples and triplets related with sensory scores

Sensory attributes of samples Sensory scale factors and corresponding numerical values Sensory scores triplet
Poor (0 0 25)a Fair (25 25 25) Good (50 25 25) Very good (75 25 25) Excellent (100 25 0)
Color/appearance
S3 0 9 9 2 0 (41.25 25 25)
S4 0 0 3 12 5 (77.5 25 18.75)
S15 0 11 9 0 0 (36.25 25 25)
S16 0 0 4 10 6 (77.5 25 17.5)
S17 0 2 11 5 2 (58.75 25 22.5)
S18 0 4 11 4 1 (52.5 25 23.75)
Taste
S3 1 8 6 2 1 (37.5 21.25 21.25)
S4 0 1 9 7 3 (65 25 21.25)
S15 2 7 7 4 0 (41.25 22.5 25)
S16 0 1 8 9 3 (70 26.25 22.5)
S17 0 6 10 2 2 (50 25 22.5)
S18 3 7 5 2 3 (43.75 21.25 21.25)
Aroma/Smell
S3 0 5 7 6 2 (56.25 25 22.5)
S4 0 3 9 4 4 (61.25 25 20)
S15 0 5 8 5 2 (55 25 22.5)
S16 0 2 9 6 3 (62.5 25 21.25)
S17 0 3 8 6 3 (61.25 25 21.25)
S18 0 2 9 5 4 (63.75 25 20)
Mouth feel
S3 0 4 10 6 0 (52.5 25 25)
S4 0 5 8 6 1 (53.75 25 23.75)
S15 0 2 6 8 4 (67.5 25 20)
S16 0 2 6 9 3 (66.5 25 21.25)
S17 0 6 10 3 1 (48.75 25 23.75)
S18 0 7 11 2 0 (43.75 25 25)
Overall
S3 (46.861 37.609 29.737)
S4 (64.126 43.659 29.855)
S15 (50.213 38.841 30.045)
S16 (68.954 45.344 30.195)
S17 (54.511 40.851 30.077)
S18 38.786 29.561)
a

Triplets related with 5‐point sensory scale.