Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2013 Apr 30;23(6):965–974. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9752-z

Table 3.

Hierarchical linear regression analyses with child emotion regulation as outcome

B SE p β F value p R2 ΔR2
(A) Regression of maternal emotion coaching on family risk
Step 1
 Constant −.04 .131 .74 4.45 .04 .06
 Family expressiveness < .01 .001 .04 .24
Step 2
 Constant −.04 .126 .76 5.33 .01 .13a .07
 Family expressiveness < .01 .001 .04 .24
 Family risk −.06 .025 .02 − .27
(B) Regression of child emotion regulation on family risk
Step 1
 Constant 3.88 .292 < .01 4.92 .03 .06
 Family expressiveness −.003 .001 .03 − .25
Step 2
 Constant 3.89 .279 < .01 6.60 < .01 .16b .09
 Family expressiveness −.003 .001 .02 − .26
 Family risk −.15 .055 .01 − .31
(C) Regression of child emotion regulation on risk and maternal emotion coaching
Step 1
 Constant 3.88 .292 < .01 4.92 .03 .06
 Family expressiveness −.003 .001 .03 − .25
Step 2
 Constant 3.92 .270 < .01 6.62 < .01 .22c .16
 Family expressiveness −.003 .001 < .01 − .32
 Family risk −.12 .055 .04 − .23
 Maternal emotion coaching .61 .253 .02 .27
a

Adjusted R2 for (A) in step 2 = .11

b

Adjusted R2 for (B) in step 2 = .13

c

Adjusted R2 for (C) in step 2 = .19