Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 30;23(12):3035–3044. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2092

Table 2.

Clinical-pathological characteristics and subtype distribution of the 4 testing sets*.

MDACC Malaga Marsden Edinburgh




N % N % N % N %




Treatment CT CT ET ET

N 272 180 103 120

HER2 status¥
    HER2-negative 272 100% 180 100% 89 86% 31 69%
    HER2-positive 0 0% 0 0% 14 14% 14 31%

Age (mean) 50.1 50.0 53.7 76.1

Menopausal status
  Pre-menopausal NA 108 60% 0 0% 0 0%
  Post-menopausal NA 72 40% 103 100% 120 100%

Tumor stage
  T0-T1 19 7% 18 10% 60 58% 10 9%
  T2 142 52% 115 67% 42 36%
  T3-T4 111 41% 39 23% 43 42% 63 55%

Node
  N0 96 35% 67 37%  61 59% 86 72%
  N1 133 49% 61 34%  39 38% 34 28%
  N2-N3 43 16% 52 29%  3 3%

Grade
  G1 28 11% 27 16% 15 15% 13 11%
  G2 136 53% 96 57% 63 62% 82 68%
  G3 91 36% 46 27% 24 23% 25 21%

ET response rate§ NA NA 53% 72%

CT response rate
  pCR breast/axilla 8.8% 6.7% NA NA

PAM50
  Luminal A 141 52% 54 30% 37 36% - -
  Luminal B 102 38% 105 58% 20 19% - -
  HER2-E 6 2% 7 4% 12 12% - -
  Basal-like 7 2% 14 8% 4 4% - -
  Normal-like 16 6% - - 30 29% - -
*

ET, endocrine therapy; CT, chemotherapy.

¥

Edinburgh dataset has 75 patients without clinical HER2 status.

§

The definition of ET response is different in the Marsden and Edinburgh datasets. Clinical tumor response (complete and partial response versus stable and progressive disease) was used as the endpoint in the Marsden dataset. Response was evaluated by imaging ultrasound in the Edinburgh dataset. Clinical tumor response was defined as tumor volume shrinkage of at least 70% by 90 days of treatment.