Table 2.
MDACC | Malaga | Marsden | Edinburgh | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
Treatment | CT | CT | ET | ET | ||||
N | 272 | 180 | 103 | 120 | ||||
HER2 status¥ | ||||||||
HER2-negative | 272 | 100% | 180 | 100% | 89 | 86% | 31 | 69% |
HER2-positive | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 14 | 14% | 14 | 31% |
Age (mean) | 50.1 | 50.0 | 53.7 | 76.1 | ||||
Menopausal status | ||||||||
Pre-menopausal | NA | 108 | 60% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | |
Post-menopausal | NA | 72 | 40% | 103 | 100% | 120 | 100% | |
Tumor stage | ||||||||
T0-T1 | 19 | 7% | 18 | 10% | 60 | 58% | 10 | 9% |
T2 | 142 | 52% | 115 | 67% | 42 | 36% | ||
T3-T4 | 111 | 41% | 39 | 23% | 43 | 42% | 63 | 55% |
Node | ||||||||
N0 | 96 | 35% | 67 | 37% | 61 | 59% | 86 | 72% |
N1 | 133 | 49% | 61 | 34% | 39 | 38% | 34 | 28% |
N2-N3 | 43 | 16% | 52 | 29% | 3 | 3% | ||
Grade | ||||||||
G1 | 28 | 11% | 27 | 16% | 15 | 15% | 13 | 11% |
G2 | 136 | 53% | 96 | 57% | 63 | 62% | 82 | 68% |
G3 | 91 | 36% | 46 | 27% | 24 | 23% | 25 | 21% |
ET response rate§ | NA | NA | 53% | 72% | ||||
CT response rate | ||||||||
pCR breast/axilla | 8.8% | 6.7% | NA | NA | ||||
PAM50 | ||||||||
Luminal A | 141 | 52% | 54 | 30% | 37 | 36% | - | - |
Luminal B | 102 | 38% | 105 | 58% | 20 | 19% | - | - |
HER2-E | 6 | 2% | 7 | 4% | 12 | 12% | - | - |
Basal-like | 7 | 2% | 14 | 8% | 4 | 4% | - | - |
Normal-like | 16 | 6% | - | - | 30 | 29% | - | - |
ET, endocrine therapy; CT, chemotherapy.
Edinburgh dataset has 75 patients without clinical HER2 status.
The definition of ET response is different in the Marsden and Edinburgh datasets. Clinical tumor response (complete and partial response versus stable and progressive disease) was used as the endpoint in the Marsden dataset. Response was evaluated by imaging ultrasound in the Edinburgh dataset. Clinical tumor response was defined as tumor volume shrinkage of at least 70% by 90 days of treatment.