Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 30;23(12):3035–3044. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2092

Table 3.

CES association with chemotherapy sensitivity in the MDACC-based dataset.

Univariate Analysis
Multivariable Analysis
Signatures N pCR
rate
OR Lower
95%
Upper
95%
p-
value
OR Lower
95%
Upper
95%
p-
value
Age (cont. variable) - - 1.0 0.93 1.02 0.251 1.0 0.92 1.02 0.205

Tumor size
  T0-T2 153 8% 1.0 - - - 1.0 - - -
  T3-T4 107 9% 1.1 0.47 2.63 0.813 0.6 0.22 1.70 0.341

Nodal status
  N0 96 7% 1.0 - - - 1.0 - - -
  N1 125 9% 1.2 0.46 3.29 0.685 0.9 0.30 2.78 0.882
  N2-3 39 13% 1.9 0.56 6.29 0.312 1.0 0.24 4.51 0.965

Grade
  1 26 4% 1.0 - - - 1.0 - - -
  2 130 4% 1.0 0.11 8.93 1.000 0.7 0.07 6.88 0.753
  3 89 17% 5.1 0.64 40.34 0.125 1.8 0.18 18.42 0.608

PAM50
  Luminal A 134 3% 1.0 - - - 1.0 - - -
  Luminal B 99 15% 5.8 1.86 18.08 0.002 1.2 0.25 6.28 0.792
  HER2-E 6 0% 0.0 - - 0.989 0.0 - - 0.991
  Basal-like 7 29% 13.0 1.91 88.50 0.009 0.4 0.02 9.97 0.586
  Normal-like 14 14% 5.4 0.90 32.69 0.065 1.7 0.23 12.75 0.602

CES
  CES-E 134 2% 1.0 - - - - - - -
  CES-U 67 9% 4.3 1.04 17.75 0.044 - - - -
  CES-C 59 24% 13.6 3.73 49.46 <0.001 - - - -

CES (cont. variable) - - 0.2 0.08 0.40 <0.001 0.2 0.03 0.77 0.022