Skip to main content
. 2017 May 30;7(2):105. doi: 10.1007/s13205-017-0739-0

Table 3.

Soil analysis

Sr no. Sample Total C (%) Total N (%) Mg (ppm) Ca (ppm) PO4 (ppm) C/N ratio
1 Control 0.48 ± 0.11 0.105 ± 0.37 312.5 ± 1.2 392.8 ± 2.1 830.1 ± 0.021 4.5714
2 Control (100 mM salt stress) 0.39 ± 0.71 0.092 ± 0.07 286.5 ± 0.2 371.4 ± 2.1 712.7 ± 0.012 4.2391
3 A + FLI 1.01 ± 0.21 0.163 ± 0.01 336.2 ± 2.5 413.1 ± 5.7 970.4 ± 0.025 6.1963
4 A + FLI (100 mM salt stress) 1.03 ± 0.31 0.159 ± 0.43 341.2 ± 1.3 411.4 ± 3.6 958 ± 0.04 6.4779
5 AI (100 mM salt stress) 0.63 ± 0.01 0.123 ± 0.76 337.4 ± 1.5 403.1 ± 4.6 748.8 ± 0.83 5.1219

Data are shown as mean ± standard error of three replicates and p < 0.05 according to Graph Pad software