Skip to main content
. 2017 May 30;7:2536. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02699-9

Table 1.

Measurement – inventory comparison (i.e. measured/modelled flux (emission) ratio). The uncertainty range is given by sub- and superscripts. PC: passenger cars; LCV: light commercial vehicle.

Measurement/inventory ratio or Measurement/emission standard ratio NOx/CO2 NOx/CO NOx/benzene
INNAQS/COPERT1,# 1.71.61.8 3.93.14.7
INNAQS/HBFA3.22 1.51.41.6 N/A
INNAQS/ACCMIP (traffic)3 4.02.85.3* 2.11.72.5
INNAQS/EMEP (traffic)# 2.92.63.3* N/A
INNAQS/US Tier II4 36.033.438.6 N/A
NOx/CO2 PC and LCV < 1305 kg NOx/CO2 LCV 1305 kg–3500 kg
INNAQS/Euro65 Diesel 4.74.35.0 4.54.14.8
Petrol 12.611.713.5 19.518.120.9
INNAQS/Euro55 Diesel 2.11.92.3 2.01.82.1
Petrol 12.611.713.5 19.518.120.9
INNAQS/Euro45 Diesel 1.51.41.6 1.41.31.5
Petrol 4.74.45.0 14.513.515.5
INNAQS/Euro35 Diesel 0.750.70.8 0.90.851.0
Petrol 2.52.32.7 18.016.719.3

1COPERT emission model (SI).

2HBFA 3.2 (SI). Comparison with HBFA 3.3, that was published during the copy editing phase, yielded an average bias of 1.2.

3ACCMIP – (SI).

4US EPA22.

5EEA24.

*For inventories that do not explicitly report CO2, we converted data using the measured midday range of CO to CO2 flux ratios (3.6 to 4.6 ppbv/ppmv), which fall close to a recent evaluation based on a road tunnel study45.

#Data are trend adjusted for 2015 according to GAINS (http://gains.iiasa.ac.at/models/)23.