Skip to main content
. 2017 May 28;23(20):3690–3701. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i20.3690

Table 3.

Correlation analysis between histological necrosis and radiological response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours and European Association for the Study of the Liver criteria n (%)

Overall response
Target lesion response
Patients (n) % of necrosis on CTA
Patients (n) % of necrosis on CTA1
100 50-99 < 50 100 50-99 < 50
mRECIST
Complete response 24 13 (54.2) 8 (33.3) 3 (12.5) 29 16 (55.2) 8 (27.6) 5 (17.2)
Partial response 26 1 (3.8) 19 (73.1) 6 (23.1) 25 2 (8.0) 16 (64.0) 7 (28.0)
Stable/progressive disease 20 0 (0.0) 1 (5.0) 19 (95.0) 16 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 16 (100.0)
EASL
Complete response 24 13 (54.2) 8 (33.3) 3 (12.5) 29 16 (55.2) 8 (27.6) 5 (17.2)
Partial response 25 1 (4.0) 17 (68.0) 7 (28.0) 25 1 (4.0) 15 (60.0) 9 (36.0)
Stable/progressive disease 21 0 (0.0) 3 (14.3) 18 (85.7) 16 1 (6.3) 1 (6.3) 14 (87.5)
1

For radio-histological correlation of the target lesion response, the percentage of necrosis on CTA was re-calculated considering only nodules ≥ 1 cm in diameter. CTA: Cumulative Tumour Area; mRECIST: Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours; EASL: European Association for the Study of the Liver.