Skip to main content
. 2017 May 28;23(20):3730–3743. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i20.3730

Table 4.

Results of meta-analysis comparison of minimally invasive living donor hepatectomy and conventional living donor hepatectomy

Outcome of interest Study (n) MILDH (n) CLDH (n) WMD/OR (95%CI) P value Study heterogeneity
P value
I2 df I2, %
Graft weight (g) 5 123 119 -3.32 (-22.25,15.61) 0.73 6.56 4 39 0.16
Donor outcomes
Operative time (min) 13 476 1116 20.68 (-6.25,47.60) 0.13 147.62 12 92 < 0.01
Estimated blood loss (mL) 12 450 1092 -32.61 (-80.44,15.21) 0.18 61.26 11 82 < 0.01
Hospital cost (dollar) 2 36 36 0.56 (-0.62,1.74) 0.35 4.24 1 76 0.04
Length of hospital stay (d) 10 392 575 -1.25 (-2.35,-0.14) 0.03 99.31 9 91 < 0.01
Post complications 12 451 632 0.62 (0.44,0.89) 0.009 4.40 11 0 0.96
Analgesic use (h) 5 139 167 -7.97 (-14.06,-1.87) 0.01 7.50 4 47 0.11
Liver function
Post AST peak (IU/L) 7 334 471 6.41 (-3.79.16.60) 0.22 13.60 6 56 0.03
Post ALT peak (IU/L) 8 350 485 11.86 (-10.84,34.57) 0.31 15.39 7 55 0.03
Post TB peak (mg/dL) 7 324 461 -0.10 (-0.26,0.06) 0.21 2.10 6 0 0.91
Recipient outcomes
Liver function
Post AST peak (IU/L) 3 59 59 -28.73 (-86.76,29.31) 0.33 0.90 2 0 0.64
Post ALT peak (IU/L) 3 59 59 -29.98 (-87.65,27.7) 0.31 0.31 2 0 0.86
Post TB peak (mg/dL) 3 59 59 -0.96 (-2.57,0.65) 0.24 1.26 2 0 0.53
Surviving 3 0.96 (0.27,3.47) 0.95 0.11 2 0 0.95
Post complications 6 272 375 0.93 (0.66,1.31) 0.68 3.28 5 0 0.66

MILDH: Minimally invasive living donor hepatectomy; CLDH: Conventional living donor hepatectomy; WMD/OR: Weight mean difference/odds ratio; df: Degree of freedom; Post: Postoperative.