Skip to main content
. 2017 May 25;47(3):299–306. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.0303

Table 2. Series comparing patients with polymorphic versus monomorphic idiopathic RVOT VT: electrocardiographic parameters*.

Polymorphic VT Monomorphic VT p
QTc in sinus rhythm (msec)
 Noda et al.10) 403±21 NA NA
 Igarashi et al.18) 440±31 440±27 NS
Number of PVCs (day)
 Noda et al.10) 17500±11300 15500±16000 NS
 Igarashi et al.18) 20000±12000 16000±15000 NS
 Kurosaki et al.16) 19000±12000 22000±10000 NS
QRS duration of PVC (msec)
 Noda et al.10) 148±8 142±12 NS
Coupling interval (msec)
 Noda et al.10) 409±62 428±65 NS
 Igarashi et al.18) 477±71 483±77 NS
 Kurosaki et al.16) 440±73 444±63 NS
Positive QRS in lead I (%)
 Kurosaki et al.16) 0071 0035 <0.05
Cycle length of VT (msec)
 Noda et al.10) 245±28 328±65 <0.001
 Igarashi et al.18) 272±59 378±85 <0.001
 Kurosaki et al.16) 224±34 330±69 <0.001
VT inducibility rate (%)
 Kurosaki et al.16) 0 1 <0.05

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). *Studies comparing patients with idiopathic polymorphic RVOT VT to patients with monomorphic RVOT VT (16 vs. 85 patients in the study by Noda et al.10) 18 vs. 21 patients in the study by Igarashi et al.18) and 14 vs. 77 in the study by Kurosaki et al).16) Refers to the QRS morphology of the ventricular extrasystole triggering VT. RVOT: right ventricular outflow tract, VT: ventricular tachycardia, PVC: premature vetricular contraction, NA: not applicable, NS: not statistically significant