Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 1;11(4):ZC128–ZC135. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24292.9756

[Table/Fig-10]:

Comparison of rigid and monophase impression material in occlusogingival (OG), mesiodistal (MD), and buccolingual (BL) dimensions.

Descriptives Rigid v/s Monophase Master Model
VISCOSITY N Mean Std.
Deviation
Std. Error Mean
Difference
t-value p-value Mean
Difference
%
difference
t-value p-value
OG RIGID 150 6.887 0.010 0.001 0.003 2.665 0.008 -0.001 -0.01 0.821 0.413
MONOPHASE 150 6.884 0.011 0.001 -0.004 -0.06 4.369 <0.0001
TOTAL 300 6.886 0.011 0.001 -0.002 -0.03 0.645 0.354
MD RIGID 150 6.297 0.039 0.003 -0.006 1.380 0.169 -0.039 -0.62 12.224 <0.0001
MONOPHASE 150 6.303 0.039 0.003 -0.033 -0.52 10.358 <0.0001
TOTAL 300 6.300 0.039 0.002 -0.036 -0.57 11.638 <0.0001
BL RIGID 150 6.300 0.035 0.003 -0.015 4.825 <0.0001 -0.036 -0.58 12.630 <0.0001
MONOPHASE 150 6.315 0.016 0.001 -0.021 -0.33 15.938 <0.0001
TOTAL 300 6.307 0.028 0.002 -0.029 -0.45 12.764 <0.0001