Table 4.

Top 10 most discriminant bacterial families of the different Octopus vulgaris paralarvae analyzed and their zooplankton prey.

Sample	Similarity	Families	Av. ab.	Con%	Cumulative
NW Spain	31.59	Flavobacteriaceae	0.10	16.99	16.99
		Comamonadaceae	0.13	15.49	32.49
		Moraxellaceae	0.08	13.55	46.04
		Sphingomonadaceae	0.03	6.11	52.15
		Corynebacteriaceae	0.03	5.16	57.31
		Staphylococcaceae	0.02	4.04	61.35
		Propionibacteriaceae	0.02	3.96	65.31
		Micrococcaceae	0.02	3.81	69.13
		Rivulariaceae	0.03	3.43	72.56
		Streptococcaceae	0.02	3.42	75.98
Morocco	42.49	Comamonadaceae	0.26	41.07	41.07
		Moraxellaceae	0.04	9.21	50.28
		Flavobacteriaceae	0.05	8.37	58.65
		Sphingomonadaceae	0.03	5.33	63.98
		Caulobacteraceae	0.03	3.91	67.90
		Xanthomonadaceae	0.03	3.85	71.75
		Chitiniphagaceae	0.02	2.90	74.65
		Corynebacteriaceae	0.02	2.89	77.54
		Bradyrhizobiaceae	0.02	2.12	79.65
		Streptococcaceae	0.02	2.08	81.73
Aquaculture	38.12	Mycoplasmataceae	0.31	52.56	52.64
		Vibrionaceae	0.20	29.60	82.15
		Rhodobacteraceae	0.05	5.67	87.83
		Flavobacteriaceae	0.02	2.70	90.53
		Alteromonadaceae	0.02	1.47	92.00
		Corynebacteriaceae	0.01	0.85	92.84
		Sphingomonadaceae	0.01	0.79	93.64
		Moraxellaceae	0.01	0.70	94.33
		Enterobacteriaceae	0.00	0.70	95.03
		Micrococcaceae	0.01	0.67	95.70
Zooplankton	37.72	Corynebacteriaceae	0.11	27.81	27.81
		Moraxellaceae	0.04	10.89	38.70
		Pseudomonadaceae	0.05	10.50	49.20
		Micrococcaceae	0.05	8.47	57.68
		Staphylococcaceae	0.03	7.05	64.73
		Propionibacteriaceae	0.03	6.44	71.17
		Sphingomonadaceae	0.03	6.34	77.51
		Streptococcaceae	0.04	3.89	81.40
		Rivulariaceae	0.14	3.62	85.02
		Microbacteriaceae	0.01	2.69	87.71

Averaged abundance (Av. ab.), contribution percentage to the total variability (Con%) and the cumulative variability explained by the families.