Table 5.

Top 10 most discriminative bacterial families driving the differences between the groups studied, with the averaged abundances (Ab.) represented for each group and their contribution percentage to the total variability (Con%).

Contrast	Dissimilarity	Families	Ab. NW	Ab. Mo.	Con%	Cumulative
NW Spain vs. Morocco	66.63	Comamonadaceae	0.13	0.26	25.78	25.78
		Flavobacteriaceae	0.10	0.05	9.30	35.07
		Moraxellaceae	0.08	0.04	7.34	42.41
		Vibrionaceae	0.02	0.03	4.23	46.65
		Sphingomonadaceae	0.03	0.03	3.78	50.43
		Alteromonadaceae	0.03	0.00	3.39	53.81
		Corynebacteriaceae	0.03	0.02	2.96	56.77
		Caulobacteraceae	0.01	0.03	2.85	59.62
		Micrococcaceae	0.02	0.02	2.79	62.41
		Pseudomonadaceae	0.02	0.01	2.78	65.18
			Ab. Wild	Ab. Aq.
Wild vs. Aquaculture	90.87	Mycoplasmataceae	0.26	0.37	28.11	28.11
		Vibrionaceae	0.04	0.24	17.43	45.54
		Comamonadaceae	0.05	0.00	12.99	58.53
		Flavobacteriaceae	0.03	0.01	4.97	63.51
		Moraxellaceae	0.03	0.01	4.76	68.27
		Rhodobacteraceae	0.03	0.04	3.56	71.83
		Alteromonadaceae	0.02	0.02	2.75	74.58
		Sphingomonadaceae	0.02	0.00	2.59	77.17
		Micrococcaceae	0.02	0.00	1.87	79.04
		Corynebacteriaceae	0.02	0.00	1.86	80.91
			Ab. Wild	Ab. Zoo.
Wild vs. Zooplankton	72.78	Comamonadaceae	0.19	0.01	17.46	17.46
		Rivulariaceae	0.02	0.14	14.30	32.76
		Corynebacteriaceae	0.02	0.11	9.32	41.08
		Flavobacteriaceae	0.08	0.01	6.62	47.70
		Moraxellaceae	0.06	0.04	4.97	52.67
		Pseudomonadaceae	0.02	0.05	4.93	57.61
		Micrococcaceae	0.02	0.05	4.25	61.86
		Streptococcaceae	0.02	0.04	3.85	65.71
		Xanthomonadaceae	0.02	0.03	3.22	68.93
		Rhodobacteraceae	0.01	0.03	3.03	71.95
			Ab. Aq.	Ab. Zoo.
Aquaculture vs. Zooplankton	88.23	Mycoplasmataceae	0.1	0.00	24.41	24.41
		Vibrionaceae	0.20	0.00	16.00	40.41
		Rivulariaceae	0.00	0.14	11.66	52.07
		Corynebacteriaceae	0.01	0.11	8.47	60.54
		Rhodobacteraceae	0.05	0.03	4.50	65.04
		Pseudomonadaceae	0.00	0.05	4.08	69.12
		Micrococcaceae	0.01	0.05	4.02	73.13
		Moraxellaceae	0.01	0.04	3.56	76.70
		Streptococcaceae	0.00	0.04	3.06	79.76
		Xanthomonadaceae	0.00	0.03	2.29	82.04