Table 3.
Differences between the intervention and control group (all participants)
| Control (N = 71) | Intervention (N = 86) | -2LL | Significance p= | ICC (DE) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change scores | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Without intervention/control | With intervention/control | Change in -2LL | df change | a | |
| Primary outcome measure | ||||||||
| Balance score (n = 100) | −3.90 (9.68) | −5.14 (9.63) | 470.31 | 470.11 | 0.21 | 2 | 0.90 | 0.75 (15.9) |
| Other outcome measures | ||||||||
| ACE-R (n = 136) | −1.76 (12.63) | −5.90 (9.93) | 1019.5 | 1015.0 | 4.5 | 2 | 0.11 | 0.37 (8.4) |
| Health today (n = 62) | 3.83 (35.80) | 2.24 (31.74) | 574.08 | 571.97 | 2.11 | 2 | 0.35 | 0.57 (12.4) |
| FES-I (n = 49) | −3.57 (5.73) | −1.86 (4.35) | 291.44 | 290.42 | 1.02 | 2 | 0.60 | 0.8 (17.7) |
| PAM-RC (n = 156) | 0.69 (3.74) | −0.88 (3.27) | 825.1 | 823.7 | 1.4 | 2 | 0.50 | 0.82 (17.5) |
| Cornell resident (n = 86) | 1.76 (5.43) | 1.56 (4.29) | 489.77 | 489.72 | 0.05 | 2 | 0.97 | 0.52 (11.4) |
| Cornell carer (n = 155) | −0.27 (4.08) | 1.0 (4.61) | 805.43 | 797.78 | 7.65 | 2 | 0.02 | 0.74 (15.8) |
| NPI-NH (n = 157) | −1.69 (13.96) | 0.96 (11.32) | 1151.66 | 1148.39 | 3.27 | 2 | 0.20 | 0.66 (14.2) |
| NPI – disruptiveness (n = 157) | −0.43 (4.51) | −0.81 (2.91) | 738.9 | 736.7 | 2.21 | 2 | 0.33 | 0.55 (12.0) |
| Sit to stand score (n = 110) | −0.02 (0.81) | −0.08 (0.87) | 255.2 | 254.5 | 0.69 | 2 | 0.71 | 0.85 (18.1) |
aAnalysed using multilevel model adjusting for clustering based on care home. The change from baseline to follow up was the dependent variable and the baseline value the independent variable