Skip to main content
. 2017 May 30;25:55. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0397-6

Table 7.

The Danish Regions Pediatric triage as a screening tool to detect A) the most ill children and B) those who went home with no treatment. Both divided by reasons for referral

Neurological reasons for referral Respiratory reasons for referral Abdominal and urological reasons for referral Fever as reason for referral Other reasons for referral
A
Ability to detect critically ill patients
 Number of patients
  True positive 1 1 0 0 3
  True negative 60 125 143 58 131
  False positive 3 19 3 7 5
  False negative 1 3 2 3 12
 Screening values
  Sensitivity 50% (1-99) 25% (1-81) 0% (0-84) 0% (0-71) 20% (4-48)
  Specificity 95% (87-99) 87% (80-92) 98% (94-100) 89% (79-96) 96% (92-99)
  PPV 25% (1-81) 5% (0-25) 0% (0-71) 0% (0-41) 38% (9-76)
  NPV 98% (91-100) 98% (93-100) 99% (95-100) 95% (86-99) 92% (86-96)
  Accuracy 94% (88-100) 85% (79-91) 97% (94-100) 85% (77-94) 89% (84-94)
 Likelihood ratios
  of positive test 10.5 (1.8-61.8) 1.9 (0.3-10.9) 0.0 0.0 5.4 (1.4-20.5)
  of negative test 0.5 (0.1-2.1) 0.9 (0.5-1.5) 1.0 (1.0-1.1) 1.1 (1.0-1.2) 0.8 (0.6-1.1)
B
Ability to detect patients who went home with no treatment
 Number of patients
  True positive 11 30 40 6 50
  True negative 22 34 37 26 36
  False positive 28 75 39 33 44
  False negative 4 9 32 3 21
 Screening values
  Sensitivity 28% (15-45) 29% (20-38) 51% (39-62) 15% (6-31) 53% (43-64)
  Specificity 85% (65-96) 79% (64-90) 54% (41-66) 90% (73-98) 63% (49-76)
  PPV 73% (45-92) 77% (61-89) 56% (43-67) 67% (30-93) 70% (58-81)
  NPV 44% (30-59) 31% (23-41) 49% (37-60) 44% (31-58) 45% (34-57)
  Accuracy 51% (38-63) 43% (35-51) 52% (44-60) 47% (35-59)
 Likelihood ratios
  of positive test 1.8 (0.7-5.1) 1.4 (0.7-2.6) 1.1 (0.8-1.5) 1.5 (0.45.5) 1.4 (10-2.1)
  of negative test 0.9 (0.7-1.1) 0.9 (0.7-1.1) 0.9 (0.7-1.3) 0.9 (0.8-11) 0.7 (0.6-1.0)

95%-confidence intervals are indicated in brackets