Table 2.
Summary of QTL for oil content traits identified in the palm population of Dura × Pisifera
| Trait | QTL | Linkage group | QTL intervala (cM) | LOD Thresholdb | LOD at peak | PVEc (%) | The nearest linkage markerd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| oil to bunch_1st period | Qoil_bunch_1.1 | LG1 | 113.1–115.0 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 13.0 | EgSNP49153***** |
| Qoil_bunch_8.1 | LG8 | 44.1–45.3 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 7.9 | EgSNP61696** | |
| oil to bunch_average | Qoil_bunch_1.1 | LG1 | 113.1–115.0 | 3.8 | 4.7 | 13.3 | EgSNP49153*** |
| Qoil_bunch_8.1 | LG8 | 44.1–45.3 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 10.5 | EgSNP61696****** | |
| oil to dry mesocarp_1st period | Qoil_mesocarp_10.1 | LG10 | 98.1–99.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 10.0 | EgSNP40659* |
| Qoil_mesocarp_8.1 | LG8 | 62.5–62.6 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 9.5 | Eg0129* | |
| oil to dry mesocarp_average | Qoil_mesocarp_10.1 | LG10 | 98.1–99.0 | 3.5 | 4.6 | 13.0 | EgSNP40659* |
| Qoil_mesocarp_8.1 | LG8 | 62.5–62.6 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 7.6 | Eg0129* |
asignificant confidence intervals (P < 0.05), bchromosome-wide LOD threshold, cpercentage of the phenotypic variance explained at the QTL, dsignificance from Kruskal-wallis analysis by software MapQTL6
*: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.005, ****: P < 0.001, *****: P < 0.0005, ******: P < 0.0001