Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 10;2016(12):CD004246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004246.pub4

Landman 2014.

Methods A multicenter, open‐label randomized trial conducted in 2 centres in Dakar, Senegal and Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Participants 120 participants.
Inclusion criteria: adults (≥ 18 years in Senegal or ≥ 21 years in Cameroon), anti‐retroviral treatment naïve, and CD4+ T‐cell count > 50 cells/mm3
Exclusion criteria: ongoing opportunistic infection, serious disease, ongoing treatment with rifampin, severe renal or hepatic disorder, Cockcroft‐Gault calculated creatinine clearance ≤ 50 mL/min, hepatitis B surface antigen‐positive, haemoglobin < 8 g/dL, neutrophil count < 500 cells/mm3, pregnant, breastfeeding, treated with any contraindicated drugs.
Interventions TDF/FTC 300/200 mg once daily and NVP 200 mg once daily for first 2 weeks and twice daily thereafter (N = 31) or TDF/FTC/EFV 300/200/600 mg once daily (N = 30)
Outcomes Virological efficacy (< 50 copies/mL), discontinuation rate, adherence rate, treatment failure, mortality, and adverse events
Notes Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Trial number NCT00573001. Funding for the study was provided by the ANRS. Gilead Sciences, Merck Sgaro & Dhome, and Abbott Laboratories provided funding for some of the antiretroviral regimens.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk The trial randomized participants to treatment.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Through a centralized web site, participants were randomized to 1 of the 4 treatment groups at an allocation ratio of 1:1:1:1.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open label study.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Losses to follow‐up were balanced between groups, and the trial authors reported the reasons for dropouts. The trial authors used ITT analyses.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The trial authors reported on all outcomes of interest.
Baseline data reported? Low risk The trial authors reported demographic characteristics, clinical stage, CD4 count, and viral load.
Other bias High risk Private funding.