Mustafa 1995.
Methods | RCT Generation of allocation sequence: randomly assigned Allocation concealment: not reported Blinding: unclear Inclusion of participants in analysis: > 90% Duration: 9 months, from April to December 1990 |
|
Participants | Number of participants: 96 enrolled Inclusion criteria: males aged < 5 years; acute watery diarrhoea; presence of moderate and severe dehydration Exclusion criteria: presence of bloody diarrhoea; no systemic illness |
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Glucose‐based ORS osmolarity | ≥ 310 mOsm/L | |
Setting | Hospital‐based trial Location: Khartoum, Sudan |
|
Notes | Study with 3 treatment arms: 2 polymer‐based ORS versus 1 control group. Data on duration of diarrhoea are skewed | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | RCT: randomly assigned |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The trial included all randomized participants in the analysis |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The trial reported over 90% of the included participants in the final analysis |
Other bias | Unclear risk | We did not detect any other sources of bias |