Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 13;2016(12):CD006519. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006519.pub3

Mustafa 1995.

Methods RCT
Generation of allocation sequence: randomly assigned
Allocation concealment: not reported
Blinding: unclear
Inclusion of participants in analysis: > 90%
Duration: 9 months, from April to December 1990
Participants Number of participants: 96 enrolled
Inclusion criteria: males aged < 5 years; acute watery diarrhoea; presence of moderate and severe dehydration
Exclusion criteria: presence of bloody diarrhoea; no systemic illness
Interventions
  • Glucose ORS: 30 participants.

  • Rice ORS: 32 participants.

  • Sorghum ORS: 34 participants.

Outcomes
  • Duration of diarrhoea.

  • Number of episodes of vomiting.

  • Number of participants with vomiting.

Glucose‐based ORS osmolarity ≥ 310 mOsm/L
Setting Hospital‐based trial
Location: Khartoum, Sudan
Notes Study with 3 treatment arms: 2 polymer‐based ORS versus 1 control group. Data on duration of diarrhoea are skewed
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk RCT: randomly assigned
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The trial included all randomized participants in the analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The trial reported over 90% of the included participants in the final analysis
Other bias Unclear risk We did not detect any other sources of bias