Ramakrishna 2008.
Methods | RCT Generation of allocation sequence: table of random numbers Allocation concealment: serially numbered ORS packages Blinding: assessors but not the participants or providers were blinded because of the nature of the study Inclusion of participants in analysis: 100% Duration: not stated |
|
Participants | Number of participants: 50 enrolled Inclusion criteria: males; 18 to 65 years old; acute watery diarrhoea Exclusion criteria: presence of bloody diarrhoea; presence of systemic illness |
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Glucose‐based ORS osmolarity | ≤ 270 mOsm/L | |
Setting | Hospital‐based trial Location: Vellore, India |
|
Notes | — | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | RCT: Table of random numbers |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Serially numbered ORS packages |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants and providers were not blinded because of the nature of the study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcome assessors were blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The trial included all randomized participants in the analysis |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The trial reported over 90% of the included participants in the final analysis |
Other bias | Unclear risk | We did not detect any other sources of bias |