Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 13;2016(12):CD006519. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006519.pub3

Ramakrishna 2008.

Methods RCT
Generation of allocation sequence: table of random numbers
Allocation concealment: serially numbered ORS packages
Blinding: assessors but not the participants or providers were blinded because of the nature of the study
Inclusion of participants in analysis: 100%
Duration: not stated
Participants Number of participants: 50 enrolled
Inclusion criteria: males; 18 to 65 years old; acute watery diarrhoea
Exclusion criteria: presence of bloody diarrhoea; presence of systemic illness
Interventions
  • Glucose ORS: 25 participants.

  • Amylase‐resistant starch ORS: 25 participants.

Outcomes
  • Total stool output (g) in first 24 hours.

  • Duration of diarrhoea.

  • Unscheduled use of intravenous fluid.

  • Number of participants with hyponatraemia.

Glucose‐based ORS osmolarity ≤ 270 mOsm/L
Setting Hospital‐based trial
Location: Vellore, India
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk RCT: Table of random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Serially numbered ORS packages
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Participants and providers were not blinded because of the nature of the study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcome assessors were blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The trial included all randomized participants in the analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The trial reported over 90% of the included participants in the final analysis
Other bias Unclear risk We did not detect any other sources of bias