Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 13;2016(12):CD006519. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006519.pub3

Sharma 1998.

Methods RCT
Generation of allocation sequence: randomized
Allocation concealment: not reported
Blinding: none
Inclusion of participants in analysis: > 90%
Duration: not stated
Participants Number of participants: 100 enrolled
Inclusion criteria: age 7 to 36 months; acute diarrhoea; some dehydration; non‐cholerae; weight > 80% of reference standard
Exclusion criteria: presence of bloody diarrhoea; presence of systemic illness; severe dehydration; malnutrition; abdominal distension
Interventions
  • Glucose ORS: 50 participants.

  • Rice ORS: 50 participants.

Outcomes
  • Total stool output (g, not in g/kg) in first 24 hours.

  • Duration of diarrhoea.

  • Number of participants with unscheduled intravenous fluid.

Glucose‐based ORS osmolarity ≥ 310 mOsm/L
Setting Hospital‐based trial
Location: Rohtak, India
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomized
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Participants, providers, outcome assessors were not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Participants, providers, outcome assessors were not blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk The trial included all randomized participants in the analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The trial reported over 90% of the included participants in the final analysis
Other bias Unclear risk We did not detect any other sources of bias