Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 31.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 14;117(7):1101–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.004

Table 2.

Characteristics of hospitals that were and were not able to provide a price estimate for coronary artery bypass grafting

Variable Hospitals
* p value
All hospitals, N=101 Hospitals able to provide a price, N=53 Hospitals unable to provide a price, N=48
CABG volume
 < 50 24 (24%) 12 (23%) 12 (25%) 0.87
 50–99 34 (34%) 16 (30%) 18 (38%)
 100–199 28 (28%) 17 (32%) 11 (23%)
 > 200 15 (15%) 8 (15.%) 7 (15%)
Geographic Region
 North Mid-Atlantic 17 (17%) 6 (11%) 11 (23%) <0.01
 South Atlantic 18 (18%) 9 (17%) 9 (19%)
 North Central 15 (15%) 14 (26%) 1 (2%)
 South Central 25 (25%) 6 (11%) 19 (40%)
 Mountain-Pacific 26 (26%) 18 (34%) 8 (17%)
Teaching Status
 Yes 29 (29%) 14 (26%) 15 (31%) 0.6
 No 72 (71%) 39 (74%) 33 (69%)
Location
 Urban 82 (81%) 39 (74%) 43 (90%) 0.04
 Rural 19 (19%) 14 (26%) 5 (10%)
Ownership
 Non-profit 73 (72%) 41 (77%) 32 (67%) 0.4
 For-profit 16 (16%) 6 (11%) 10 (21%)
 Government 12 (12%) 6 (11%) 6 (13%)
STS Scores availability N = 39 N = 23 N = 16
 Mortality scores 2.1 2.1 2.2 0.53
 Composite scores 96.4 96.6 96.2 0.34
*

p Values compare hospitals that provided a price for CABG with hospitals that were unable to provide a price.

Bold value indicates statistically significance.