Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 31.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2010 May;63(5):1269–1279. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22321

Table 2.

Summary of Results for HIFU Heating Experiments*

Comparison Five hottest vox diff RMSE
Mean (1.1–1.9), fully sampled vs model only −0.1°C ± 0.9°C 0.83°C
Mean (1.1–1.9), fully sampled vs 1.1–1.9, fully sampled   0.2°C ± 1.0°C 0.38°C
1.1–1.9, fully sampled vs 1.1–1.9, MPF R = 2.6   0.4°C ± 0.1°C 0.22°C
1.1–1.9, fully sampled vs 1.1–1.9, MPF R = 4.8   0.8°C ± 0.4°C 0.29°C
1.1–1.9, fully sampled vs 1.1–1.9, MPF R = 7.1   0.8°C ± 0.5°C 0.33°C
2.A vs 2.B −0.3°C ± 0.9°C 0.42°C
2.A vs 2.C   0.0°C ± 1.7°C 0.59°C
*

Temperature differences over the five hottest voxels in the hottest time frame and a temperature RMSE over a 24 × 7 × 3 × 25 ROI are displayed.