Table 2.
Comparison of our proposed method in the cases of using different modality combinations. “*” indicates statistically significant difference with MRI+PET+SNP
Modalities | AD vs. NC (%) | MCI vs. NC (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACC | SEN | SPE | ACC | SEN | SPE | |
MRI | 88.4* | 84.1 | 93.0 | 71.6 | 83.9 | 47.2 |
PET | 86.3* | 84.5 | 88.1 | 68.8 | 85.5 | 35.7 |
SNP | 76.0* | 69.8 | 82.6 | 66.2 | 75.4 | 48.1 |
MRI+PET | 92.3* | 91.9 | 91.7 | 76.4 | 83.9 | 61.5 |
MRI+SNP | 91.1* | 89.8 | 92.6 | 74.9 | 84.5 | 55.7 |
PET+SNP | 92.0* | 90.8 | 93.2 | 71.3 | 81.4 | 51.3 |
MRI+PET+SNP | 96.1 | 97.3 | 94.9 | 80.3 | 85.6 | 69.8 |