Skip to main content
. 2017 May 31;5(6):E489–E495. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-106180

Table 4. Odds ratios for cecal intubation in a logistic regression model adjusting for colonoscopy category, gender, Boston Bowel Preparation Score, indication for CS, endoscopist category.

Unadjusted OR Adjusted OR
No. of CS Mean (95 % CI) P value Mean (95 % CI) P value
CS category
Clinical CS 6917
[7092]
1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
Work-up CS 2604
[2630]
2.0 (1.4 – 2.9)
[2.2 (1.7 – 2.9)]
< 0.001
[< 0.001]
0.9 (0.5 – 1.7)
[1.2 (0.7 – 2.0)]
0.85
[0.51]
Screening CS 746
[754]
1.0 (0.62 – 1.52)
[1.3 (0.9 – 1.9)]
0.89
[0.18]
0.8 (0.4 – 1.7)
[0.8 (0.4 – 1.7)]
0.60
[0.60]
Gender
Men 5222
[5324]
1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
Women 5045
[5152]
0.5 (0.4 – 0.7)
[0.6 (0.5 – 0.8)]
< 0.001
[< 0.001]
0.7 (0.5 – 1.0)
[0.7 (0.5 – 0.9)]
0.06
[0.01]
BBPS 9196
[9272]
1.9 (1.8 – 2.1)
[2.1 (1.9 – 2.2)]
< 0.001
[< 0.001]
2.0 (1.8 – 2.1)
[2.1 (1.9 – 2.3)]
< 0.001
[< 0.001]
Indication for CS
Symptoms 4799
[4928]
1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
Polyp surveillance 1138
[1150]
2.6 (1.5 – 4.5)
[2.7 (1.8 – 4.2)]
0.001
[< 0.001]
2.8 (1.1 – 7.0)
[2.9 (1.4 – 6.1)]
0.03
[0.01]
IBD surveillance 482
[492]
1.1 (0.6 – 1.9)
[1.1 (0.7 – 1.7)]
0.77
[0.56]
0.7 (0.3 – 1.4)
[0.8 (0.4 – 1.6)]
0.31
[0.56]
Unspecified 498
[517]
0.8 (0.5 – 1.3)
[0.8 (0.5 – 1.1)]
0.42
[0.12]
1.5 (0.6 – 3.6)
[1.8 (0.9 – 3.6)]
0.35
[0.12]
Endoscopist group 1
Senior 7141
[7295]
1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
Junior 3126
[3181]
1.8 (1.3 – 2.4)
[1.5 (1.2 – 1.8)]
< 0.001
[0.001]
2.0 (1.2 – 3.5)
[2.3 (1.4 – 3.6)]
0.01
[< 0.001]
Age (years) 2 10267
[10476]
1.0 (1.0 – 1.0)
[0.987 [0.980 – 0.995)]
0.34
[0.001]

[0.997 (0.985 – 1.008)]
[0.56]
Endoscopy center 2
Centre 1 1355
[1384]
1.0 (reference)
Center 2 1880
[1909]
0.9 (0.6 – 1.5)
[1.1 (0.8 – 1.6)]
0.80
[0.58]
Center 3 4381
[4493]
1.0 (0.7 – 1.5)
[0.9 (0.7 – 1.2)]
0.90
[0.44]
Center 4 2651
[2690]
0.9 (0.6 – 1.3)
[1.1 (0.8 – 1.5)]
0.51
[0.62]

OR, odds ratio; CS, colonoscopy screening; BPPS, Boston Bowel Preparation Score; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease

1

End result of CIR after assistance when required (1.2 % of examinations by seniors and 15.5 % by juniors).

2

Patient age and endoscopy center did not reach statistical significance level in the univariate logistic regression and were not included in the adjusted model. Results including cases declared by the endoscopist to be impossible to intubate due to mechanical obstruction (stricture or fecal masses) are added in [brackets].